Even those will not be enough. At this point we have foreign people who have mixed and lived here for two or three generations so we’ll need to do what you suggest and do contend with those somehow.
The only radical enough solutions will trigger civil war or protracted civil war with other countries siding with each claimants to the land in exchange for land and the outcome of this war will surely result in the loss/gain of territory.
Imagine yourself triggering a civil war with a part of native English on one side, a hodgepodge of anarchists and communists led by native English, at least two factions of Muslims, the Indians siding with various sides and demanding concessions of their own… and then, add to this Russians, Chinese, Europeans, and Americans giving support and weapons to one side or most probably, many sides at the same time in exchange for territory.
If you think this is as easy as changing laws, watching the changes take effect in the telly, and then step out of your home to enjoy the 90s like nothing happened, you’re being very naive.
Changes of this magnitude are never even attempted without triggering war, poverty, violence, and chaos (Lebanon, Balkans, South American wars of independice, etc). We are back in history and the 90s will not come back.
Western countries are not invaded by a single people but by a panoply of other nationalities and ethnicities. To make matters worse, many of these have already mixed or borne in the country. Separation would take a new ideology that has to be contend with all of those and just changing laws would not be enough.
I am not saying no, I am saying this needs a more nuanced planning.
Excellent piece and the proposed plan of action seems not only possible but likely. I do think the century part is too generous, though. The current situation, even little more than a generation ago, would have been unimaginable. There were outlines of it, sure, but the current realities would have seemed fantastical even in the Nineties.
This all seems fine and dandy, but the proper solution in our current predicament is this:
1. males have to learn to fight
2. women and children have to learn to avoid the Bomalians altogether
3. communities must self-organise around smaller and local clades with citizen groups of peacekeepers / patrols
We have the following to contend with:
1. Enemies within the gates, en masse
2. Enemies in our parliaments, institutions - this means traitors and those using wasmannian or aggressive mimicry as well
3. Low reproductive rates (for now - this will change when mortality salients rise, so soon)
4. Lack of group cohesion (this is also changing, as we are seeing with the English regaining their ethnic centre)
I would say the main issue is that the enemy's leadership is all encompassing and all powerful, though it is a mirage. AI, Digital ID and fully digital money will further empower them, but cannot solidify their hold on that power. Localised groups will always have the advantage, and the more decentralised localised groups there are, the higher said multi-node disruption of the systems of control. People are slowly realising that laws don't quite matter. Institutions are indeed failing - even if the heads at the top are clever, you cannot run a system on Bomalian intelligence.
Edit: I think the times of gloves on approaches have passed.
It is said, that it takes less than 5% of the population to change. Political scientist Erica Chenoweth analysed hundreds of nonviolent and violent resistance movements from 1900–2006. She found that every nonviolent campaign that mobilised at least 3.5% of the population succeeded in bringing about major political change. Importantly, many succeeded with less than that, but 3.5% was the threshold where success became almost certain. This became known as the “3.5% Rule,” popularised in Chenoweth’s book Why Civil Resistance Works.
In a large society, 3–5% is still millions of people (e.g. ~2 million in the UK, ~11 million in the US). But the influence comes not only from size but also from visibility, persistence, and disruption. A committed minority can shift the narrative and social “common sense.” Once a movement gains legitimacy in public discourse, wider passive support often follows. The tide is turning.
These are interesting observations. I had not heard of this, especially such low numbers. But it does explain the ascendency of things most are indifferent to like the climate stuff or gay marriage. Only a small number are needed if they act together.
It is not just that European cultures may be “offensive” to these aliens, and not just that these aliens cannot create or maintain European culture, it is that they are actively encouraged to be even more offended by European culture, and more destructive of it than they would naturally be. I am pleased to see that Woes is putting forward a plan, and ideas regarding reversing this. Whether or not these plans are successful in the future is something we cannot know from where we are now. However plans can be adapted, and developed as needs be. However, people need to start thinking and planning now.
I know a lot of 1st and 2nd and 3rd gen immigrants, mostly S Asian - they generally whine about how racist the Yoo-K is, or they live denatured modern lives in shopping centres, in ghettos or Barratt houses. It's very rare to meet any who have the slightest love for the countryside, the language, the literature, the pre-modern-shite architecture, if anything these would only provoke unease & distaste, a sense that they ARE foreign.
It shouldn't be too hard to rebalance incentives so they leave of their own accord, they mostly speak e.g. Urdu and regularly visit their "old country" so there wouldn't even be any real "humanitarian" concerns, as if anyone will care about such things in 5 years. From my experience, very very few feel any real attachment to this country, and those few would amusingly enough be enthusiastic about rounding up the rest & shipping them off to Bomalia.
My feeling is that there will be something like a religious revival in Britain, and along with it an awakening of racial awareness. There will be mass enthusiasm, in the etymolgical sense.
Those people feel the same way about their parent’s original country culture and history. They are the perfect postmodern citizen. Vape shop, fried chicken, porn, eternal present.
This is my view too. On both points. It is not a promised land for the immigrants, plus it is freezing, lol. Then there is the fact it will almost certainly backfire and encourage nationalism. How could it not?
Oaths of loyalty to the Norweden people - and, I would suggest, White people more broadly - are great, but why limit it to a few public officials in specific roles? Why not require it of every citizen who comes of age, as well as tie said loyalty to *citizenship* with all the rights it entails?
Disloyalty to our race/ethnos should carry harsh and permanent legal consequences, especially for politicians and public servants. At a minimum, it should carry the penalty of severely lowered social/financial status.
The oath, and the advancement to adult/citizen status, should come as the coronation of a learning/training process, an agoge, where the excessive ethnic trust and openness of Whites is wringed out of the new generations, and ethnic loyalty is impressed in them from a variety of angles.
Every young White person should learn from an early age about the biological component of our shared identity, about racial differences in character traits, cultural accomplishments and so on.
They should not only learn about our history broadly speaking, but more specifically about the ways in which our ancestors were undermined and subverted in the past, most disastrously in the 20th century. They should be taught to watch for any such attempts in the future, and be fluent in the strategies and tactics typically employed by the infiltrators and the traitors who would endanger our existance once again if given half a chance.
Most importantly, they should be taught about our own flaws and blind spots as a group, and all the bio-cultural processes (such as r-selection prevalence or dysgenic trends) that may once again threaten us if allowed to take place.
If we ever get out of this mess, everything should be done to prevent the weakness and the foolishness that brought us to our current predicament. Changing the laws is not enough; we must build a better, stronger *people*.
"Others will approve of it and take part in it gleefully - including some who are avowed progressives today. In fact I think they will be among the most unfeeling and cold-hearted."
Yes. The progressives who will be punished will be the true believers, those who, however misguided they may be, retain something in the way of principles and integrity. The real scumbags will just instantly reinvent themselves as nationalists, and you'll never guess they'd ever been anything else.
In my opinion we should just accept them becoming nationalists. Harboring contempt, resentment, and a desire for vengeance on these people would be counter productive.
You can't expect most people to be that politically engaged. A lot, if not most people, aren't that interested in politics. They just want to live their lives and end adopting whatever the default position they are conditioned into.
As long as the people who control what that default position is have the nations best interests at heart, this isn't a problem.
Even those will not be enough. At this point we have foreign people who have mixed and lived here for two or three generations so we’ll need to do what you suggest and do contend with those somehow.
The only radical enough solutions will trigger civil war or protracted civil war with other countries siding with each claimants to the land in exchange for land and the outcome of this war will surely result in the loss/gain of territory.
Imagine yourself triggering a civil war with a part of native English on one side, a hodgepodge of anarchists and communists led by native English, at least two factions of Muslims, the Indians siding with various sides and demanding concessions of their own… and then, add to this Russians, Chinese, Europeans, and Americans giving support and weapons to one side or most probably, many sides at the same time in exchange for territory.
If you think this is as easy as changing laws, watching the changes take effect in the telly, and then step out of your home to enjoy the 90s like nothing happened, you’re being very naive.
Changes of this magnitude are never even attempted without triggering war, poverty, violence, and chaos (Lebanon, Balkans, South American wars of independice, etc). We are back in history and the 90s will not come back.
Western countries are not invaded by a single people but by a panoply of other nationalities and ethnicities. To make matters worse, many of these have already mixed or borne in the country. Separation would take a new ideology that has to be contend with all of those and just changing laws would not be enough.
I am not saying no, I am saying this needs a more nuanced planning.
Excellent piece and the proposed plan of action seems not only possible but likely. I do think the century part is too generous, though. The current situation, even little more than a generation ago, would have been unimaginable. There were outlines of it, sure, but the current realities would have seemed fantastical even in the Nineties.
This was mostly written in March, which is a testament to how much things have changed even since then.
Ha!
This all seems fine and dandy, but the proper solution in our current predicament is this:
1. males have to learn to fight
2. women and children have to learn to avoid the Bomalians altogether
3. communities must self-organise around smaller and local clades with citizen groups of peacekeepers / patrols
We have the following to contend with:
1. Enemies within the gates, en masse
2. Enemies in our parliaments, institutions - this means traitors and those using wasmannian or aggressive mimicry as well
3. Low reproductive rates (for now - this will change when mortality salients rise, so soon)
4. Lack of group cohesion (this is also changing, as we are seeing with the English regaining their ethnic centre)
I would say the main issue is that the enemy's leadership is all encompassing and all powerful, though it is a mirage. AI, Digital ID and fully digital money will further empower them, but cannot solidify their hold on that power. Localised groups will always have the advantage, and the more decentralised localised groups there are, the higher said multi-node disruption of the systems of control. People are slowly realising that laws don't quite matter. Institutions are indeed failing - even if the heads at the top are clever, you cannot run a system on Bomalian intelligence.
Edit: I think the times of gloves on approaches have passed.
It is said, that it takes less than 5% of the population to change. Political scientist Erica Chenoweth analysed hundreds of nonviolent and violent resistance movements from 1900–2006. She found that every nonviolent campaign that mobilised at least 3.5% of the population succeeded in bringing about major political change. Importantly, many succeeded with less than that, but 3.5% was the threshold where success became almost certain. This became known as the “3.5% Rule,” popularised in Chenoweth’s book Why Civil Resistance Works.
In a large society, 3–5% is still millions of people (e.g. ~2 million in the UK, ~11 million in the US). But the influence comes not only from size but also from visibility, persistence, and disruption. A committed minority can shift the narrative and social “common sense.” Once a movement gains legitimacy in public discourse, wider passive support often follows. The tide is turning.
These are interesting observations. I had not heard of this, especially such low numbers. But it does explain the ascendency of things most are indifferent to like the climate stuff or gay marriage. Only a small number are needed if they act together.
It is not just that European cultures may be “offensive” to these aliens, and not just that these aliens cannot create or maintain European culture, it is that they are actively encouraged to be even more offended by European culture, and more destructive of it than they would naturally be. I am pleased to see that Woes is putting forward a plan, and ideas regarding reversing this. Whether or not these plans are successful in the future is something we cannot know from where we are now. However plans can be adapted, and developed as needs be. However, people need to start thinking and planning now.
Excellent series, MW!
Numbers 13 and 25 are absolutely crucial. Narrative control is an essential key. Without question.
All this is inevitable.. But how far down the road and how much chaos there will be I cannot say..
I know a lot of 1st and 2nd and 3rd gen immigrants, mostly S Asian - they generally whine about how racist the Yoo-K is, or they live denatured modern lives in shopping centres, in ghettos or Barratt houses. It's very rare to meet any who have the slightest love for the countryside, the language, the literature, the pre-modern-shite architecture, if anything these would only provoke unease & distaste, a sense that they ARE foreign.
It shouldn't be too hard to rebalance incentives so they leave of their own accord, they mostly speak e.g. Urdu and regularly visit their "old country" so there wouldn't even be any real "humanitarian" concerns, as if anyone will care about such things in 5 years. From my experience, very very few feel any real attachment to this country, and those few would amusingly enough be enthusiastic about rounding up the rest & shipping them off to Bomalia.
My feeling is that there will be something like a religious revival in Britain, and along with it an awakening of racial awareness. There will be mass enthusiasm, in the etymolgical sense.
Those people feel the same way about their parent’s original country culture and history. They are the perfect postmodern citizen. Vape shop, fried chicken, porn, eternal present.
This is my view too. On both points. It is not a promised land for the immigrants, plus it is freezing, lol. Then there is the fact it will almost certainly backfire and encourage nationalism. How could it not?
Step 0: Pogroms. None of the other steps can be implemented until the master deceiver is removed.
Oaths of loyalty to the Norweden people - and, I would suggest, White people more broadly - are great, but why limit it to a few public officials in specific roles? Why not require it of every citizen who comes of age, as well as tie said loyalty to *citizenship* with all the rights it entails?
Disloyalty to our race/ethnos should carry harsh and permanent legal consequences, especially for politicians and public servants. At a minimum, it should carry the penalty of severely lowered social/financial status.
The oath, and the advancement to adult/citizen status, should come as the coronation of a learning/training process, an agoge, where the excessive ethnic trust and openness of Whites is wringed out of the new generations, and ethnic loyalty is impressed in them from a variety of angles.
Every young White person should learn from an early age about the biological component of our shared identity, about racial differences in character traits, cultural accomplishments and so on.
They should not only learn about our history broadly speaking, but more specifically about the ways in which our ancestors were undermined and subverted in the past, most disastrously in the 20th century. They should be taught to watch for any such attempts in the future, and be fluent in the strategies and tactics typically employed by the infiltrators and the traitors who would endanger our existance once again if given half a chance.
Most importantly, they should be taught about our own flaws and blind spots as a group, and all the bio-cultural processes (such as r-selection prevalence or dysgenic trends) that may once again threaten us if allowed to take place.
If we ever get out of this mess, everything should be done to prevent the weakness and the foolishness that brought us to our current predicament. Changing the laws is not enough; we must build a better, stronger *people*.
Fabulous list and article. It is EXACTLy what needs to be done.
Excellent. Like the phased approach, winning by stealth. Will restack this.
I offer similar ideas (but not as delineated) here
https://futuredad.substack.com/p/futuredad-40-the-west-can-only-focus?r=59rk8t
We not only deserve to flourish but must. We need a real morale boost. Essays like this go some way towards achieving that good sir! So kudos!
"Others will approve of it and take part in it gleefully - including some who are avowed progressives today. In fact I think they will be among the most unfeeling and cold-hearted."
Yes. The progressives who will be punished will be the true believers, those who, however misguided they may be, retain something in the way of principles and integrity. The real scumbags will just instantly reinvent themselves as nationalists, and you'll never guess they'd ever been anything else.
In my opinion we should just accept them becoming nationalists. Harboring contempt, resentment, and a desire for vengeance on these people would be counter productive.
You can't expect most people to be that politically engaged. A lot, if not most people, aren't that interested in politics. They just want to live their lives and end adopting whatever the default position they are conditioned into.
As long as the people who control what that default position is have the nations best interests at heart, this isn't a problem.
Totally agree. Any nationalist movement can make good use of psychopaths.