How Best to Boil the Frog?
With the signing of Trump’s inaugural Executive Orders, and the total lack of protest against them in the MSM, it is now undeniable that, at least in America, Woke is being “put away”. But why? And what is the game plan?
I think the “why” is fairly clear:
they need White American men to fight wars. Lesbian-controlled drones are a thing, but so still are “boots on the ground”. Basically any physical military operation is best done by White men.
the White American cash cow can still be milked yet. Why kill the goose while it’s still laying the golden eggs?
there was a danger of White American men rebelling against their dispossession. While “lone wolf” nutcases can be handled and even instrumentalised by the regime, “tribing up”, forming racial communities, poses a real danger to it if done in any large numbers, and this was being encouraged by the insane Woke ideology (not just the anti-white rhetoric, but the awful trans stuff)
mesmerising the masses with another cycle of the political circus
economic reasons? Probably not, when it’s all funny money anyway. But still, economic reasons can be used as a front rationale (“we need Americans to have jobs!” and “we need to pay off the national debt!”)
as a caveat to the above, Woke was having an awkwardly obvious impact with DEI causing “the competence crisis”, which in turn gave the emerging “Tech Bros” a vector to attack Woke in general. The “Tech Bros” are powerful and it is worth placating their financial desires if, in return, you get their cooperation
multiculturalism in Western countries is beginning to make ordinary Jews uncomfortable. They are realising that White people are actually the most well-disposed towards them, while Ahmed, Daljit, Wuang-Peng and Mumra will openly work against them
the Woke programme was becoming too unwieldy to justify. If you are going to subject White men to pervasive propaganda about how evil they are and how terrific it is when their women marry Black men, then you need a huge apparatus of censorship to prevent White men complaining about it and telling each other what is going on. It is much easier to simply stop the pervasive propaganda.
October 7th made Jews feel they (still) have more to gain by placating the goy mainstream than by eradicating it. Israel isn’t yet ready to stand on its own, without the golem of America. It needs to build up its population, its weaponry, its defence capability, etc. This is true even though October 7th was deliberately allowed to happen (Israel was warned by at least one other state, Egypt, about the imminent attack). Israel basically has one generation left before White Americans (for simple generational reasons) stop caring about the Holocaust. October 7th was a gambit to accelerate the strengthening of Israel - but the cost was it pitted Zionists against Wokeists.
Those are (at least some) reasons why “they’re putting the Woke away”. This includes a shift in rhetoric and the rehabilitation of Trump as a completely acceptable political figure and of Elon Musk as “an okay guy” (even when he throws Romans).
But it would be foolish to think that, if Woke is over, the anti-white agenda is over.
First, let us dismiss as irrelevant several groups:
the armies of DEI witches infesting corporations, schools, universities and organisations. Those women are demented Renfields and will do whatever they are told.
the “White” academics who laid decades of groundwork for 2010s Wokery. They did what they were paid to do and genetically inclined to do, and their work had a real effect, but they were never “in charge”. Their influence was real, but was being leased to them. In the end, their post can be taken away from them as easily as a social media account can be taken away from an influencer - and, with it, their influence vapourised. (But for an academic the loss is actually total, because there is only one academia to be deplatformed from.)
the armies of journalists, pundits, anchors, reporters and commissioning editors who inform the masses and shape public opinion. Again, their influence is real, but is being leased to them. They will do whatever they are told or else get fired and made unemployable in their field. (We might see a few symbolic firings in order to establish the new mainstream, but more likely the transition will be “organic”, with mistakes forgiven along the way when some pundit says something that is no longer “okay” - it’ll be like when an old-timer in the 2000s accidentally said “half-caste”.)
It seems likely that these three groups (especially the first two) genuinely believed in Woke and continue to do so. Why wouldn’t they? They are rabid and irrational, and Woke is their favourite toy. It dials in to the White woman’s frustration, the coloured reporter’s resentment, and the Jewish academic’s Loxism. At some point, if allowed to, all three would be full-throated in pushing it again. But they would have to be “allowed” to - they are lieutenants, not generals.
So they are not the reason I think the anti-white programme will continue. For that, we have to go to the parties who made all of this happen in the first place, which is international banking and high finance. At that level, you don’t worry about economics, since you control the money supply (this is why economic arguments are even less relevant than the afore-mentioned groups). If Woke is being ramped down, we have to assume this is because it has been judged by “the denizens of high finance” to be counter to their long-term goals, which remain genocidally anti-white.
I think a likely explanation, which ties much of the above together, is that this is being done so as to afford breathing space for converting America from a White hyperpower to a Kalergi superpower. The essential thing is that the new Kalergi American should champion Zionism as ardently as his White Christian predecessor did. As things currently stand, the ingredients of tomorrow’s Kalergi American are still very attached to their ancestral identities (Indian, Chinese, African-American). This makes them unlikely to champion Zionism, because they have an identity of their own to prize and defend. That has to be removed from them in the way that the Boomer White American had nothing to prize and defend except Israel. But POC are not mesmerised by principles in the way that Whites are, so a different strategy is going to be needed for them. I think that might be the realisation that has motivated the shift we are seeing. It is not just that Woke inflames their awareness of their identity; it’s that you want them to forget their identity entirely. In that sense, though Woke did agitate them against Whitey short-term, long-term it was having the opposite to the desired effect.
The surprising thing about this is that they needed to learn the hard way. Why was it not obvious, in advance, that stepping away from 1960s-1990s race-blindness and encouraging POC to value their identities would get in the way of absorbing them and creating the Kalergi man? Maybe it was obvious, but Woke was deemed worthwhile anyway since it would culturally dislodge the White majority. Either way, the overkill is being rectified now.
So the ramping down has a dual purpose:
keep Whites placated and fooled (restoration of “principles” and “race-blindness” and “merit”)
afford time to condition their Kalergi replacements (perhaps by undermining their ancestral identities and getting them on-board with being “just consumers”)
The long-term goal is probably to slowly downgrade the West genetically, keeping its populations loyal until they are too stupid to spell the word, and then abandon it in about 200 years. By that time the West will have been utterly destroyed (genetically, permanently) and Israel will have wiped out its geographic neighbours and established unchallengeable predominance in the region.
If that is the plan, I don’t think it will work out. I think, long before Whites disappear genetically, they will have lost predominance in their countries such that those countries will have become ungovernable. Indeed, the end of White predominance is baked into the plan, is an essential step in the plan. But it is a perilous step that I don’t think can be safely navigated, because the end of White predominance means the end of all function - in the police, the government, the essential services, the military... Of course the idea will be to have a Kalergi police force, a Kalergi government, a Kalergi military… but such entities will be easily defeated by any White force that takes them on.
We live in interesting times, but they are interesting times that guarantee our eventual victory - as long as we, and our progeny, remain who we are.
A bleak but beautiful synopsis, as ever, Woes. Race is such a brutally obvious truth that, in a way, one needs to overcome one's polite, respectable middle-class sensitivities in order to be able not only to acknowledge it but celebrate it as a cultural dynamic.
As a 'boomer' I grew up with this distaste for race as a reality. My parents fought/worked in (and for) the '39-45 war; subsequently the Holocaust was revealed to an already shell-shocked culture, and the mass emotion that then issued from the middle-classes (who make up the vast majority of the normie bloc) was that race would be allowed (consciously or unconsciously) to slip gently out of our cultural purview: "oh well, darling, I don't think we need to bother about all that stuff, do you? We're all brothers and sisters under the skin, after all!' (etc, etc.) Of course, two generations of vicious deconstruction of European identity was then unleashed on us via academia, media and entertainment and we went from forgetting race, to denying it, then reviling it, then outlawing it.
This kind of cultural, racial amnesia is, as we all now know, a devastating phenomenon: once suffered, it is, a long way back for a race and the atomised individuals that comprise it. That said if I, a deeply sensitive, little Lord Fauntleroy 'boomer' lyric poet can do it anyone can! - I jest, of course, insofar as the spirit of the true poet is, whilst deeply sensitive to the nuances of the human experience, also steely, enduring, impassioned and unashamedly warlike when the cause of a people's freedom is threatened. As William Blake famously declared: "Bring me my bow of burning gold! Bring me my arrows of desire! I shall not sleep - Oh clouds unfold! Bring me my chariot of fire!"
We're all going to need that attitude if we're to survive - which we will, of course.
So, you’re optimistic about the long-term trajectory—but what kind of timeline are we looking at before we see a systemic shift back toward European sovereignty and the emergence of non-subverted governance?
Devon Stack often discusses the idea of raising the next generations of “John Connors” in more rural areas while gradually fostering economic independence. But realistically, are we expecting the next 20–50 years to be a period of continued decline? Or does this "meritocratic" shift signal a tangible improvement in the daily life of you and me within a foreseeable timeframe? UK mainstream adverts are still ~60% black with inter mixing in more or less everything.
I tend to believe that much of the British middle class has fully internalised this kind if propaganda and will continue to do so until they fade into irrelevance as genetic dead ends. Maybe I'm being pessimistic but covid showed the level of passivity among them.
Finally, with younger generations in Britain increasingly relocating to Southeast Asia or Eastern Europe, many are attempting to establish their own expat communities. Given that significant change seems unlikely in the short term, could this approach be a viable strategy over the next 10–20 years? Or is it ultimately just another temporary escape?