With the signing of Trump’s inaugural Executive Orders, and the total lack of protest against them in the MSM, it is now undeniable that, at least in America, Woke is being “put away”.
Insightful piece with an accurate account of who wields power in the West. I read this before but have returned to it having heard your name dropped in a piece by Zander’s Substack, and I have to give this a 10/10. Sorry I cannot become a paid subscriber at the moment and hope that changes in the future.
My eyes are on the West, under small hat control, and Russia Iran China. There is some difficulty getting to Iran with friends like that. Will a false flag once again happen like the past it’s hard to say. But with Iran having broken the Iron Dome, the small hats MUST finish them off as they are an existential threat. An existential threat for them is anywhere on earth as they manage to piss natives off where ever they go.
For years I have heard references to “international banking and finance” as the end-all be-all explanation of why we are where we are (and of course a traditional source of you-know-who’s power) and I see this again in this essay.
However, I have never seen any source actually dive into this, with names, money flows, etc. to explain HOW exactly banking can cause the rot we see. I don’t see even an indirect link between the cat ladies destroying my local rural libraries and “finance.” Am I missing something huge here? Woes, have you written more about this somewhere else, or know of other good resources to learn more? Thank you if you’re reading this.
(Also, I’ve read “A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind” and it didn’t help. The book is a little kooky and certainly didn’t draw any clear causality between our current state and banking)
Technology and AI will, to a large extent, replace those jobs performed by competent men. The technocratic control grid will be used to govern the people. I don't think future warfare will require 1000s of highly-trained intelligent people - just a few hundred to control the masses and strategise.
I may be charged with being a contrarian—a blackpilled doomer, if you wish—and that’s ok with me. But I really don’t believe that the woke has been put away at all. I believe it is merely a rhetorical ploy; the establishment right signalled that the woke era is over, which the dissident/online right then picked up and broadcasted to its audience. At that point, the establishment left and its dissident/online faction learned what’s happening on the other side, and then, in turn, responded to it. After all, reaction is symbiotic. And voilà, the narrative, not the reality, became the focus and current state of affairs.
Despite all of the claims circulating about, my eyes and cognitive functioning tell me that the woke is very much present and still growing. It’s easy to see and understand, if one just looks beyond that superficial claim.
I actually agree with you. It's very complicated, and I wanted this essay to show "one side of the situation", with others in the future showing other sides. For example, this essay is really about America. In Europe, and certainly Britain, I think the situation with "woke" is very different. As long as Starmer's Labour are in power, I don't think we will see much real change unless it is forced on them by America. Also, the people in the media will still believe all the same stuff as in 2020. I could imagine them biting the bullet and accepting that they need to be more subtle and less preachy, but no more than that.
I think you're wrong about Kalergi Zionism. You seem to be overlooking the profound differences which separate whites from all other races, and which, unfortunately, make us uniquely susceptible to Jewish manipulation. Jews will be sunk without whites, and all their hatred and fanaticism isn't enough to blind them to this fact. This is not to say they always judge their own interests well, but I believe their instincts tell them that the mixed Afro-Asian Zionist will never be a thing.
Are young UK White expats REALLY going to SE Asia or E. Europe and forming self replicating communities?
I'd be thunderstruck if that were true.
Any in E Europe will just melt into the local population if they hopefully find local women (or men)
The ones going to SE Asia are 99.99% men and the vast majority of those are just there to fuck the various local Orientals in a decades long hedonistic bender ending with each of their genetic oblivions.
In two recent trips in which my wife and I were driven to our destination by non-White drivers, I involved myself in general conversation with them regarding the state of affairs in the World. In some ways I felt as if I was talking to someone from 40 years ago. From these drivers there was no, "I have nothing against transgender people, but..." or "we're all just people, we're all the same deep down", rather these people spoke their mind. I even felt quite comfortable talking about the Jews to them, no problems.
Putting aside the long term problem that Whites tend to be against their own heritage and identity, and these non-Whites tend to be very proud of their people and heritage, it did make me think that these people could be really, really woken up to the Jews and their agenda. From there I decided to present to people the idea of humanity (including us people of European blood) defending ourselves against the Jews and all the agendas they push. This will take some pressure off Whites and place it upon the Jews, who we can link to the globalist agenda.
Just my thoughts, and I understand that I focus on the Jewish problem more than most.
I think if we take genetics seriously, then the White soy boys of today are just a step away from the public schoiolboys who blew sepoys out of cannons last century, from the Aryan steppe-dwellers who were howling berserkers millennia before that. There just hasn't been enough time for that to change on any fundamental level - the social conditioning is superficial in the long run.
Thie question is when will the bloody Saxon awake? What will it take? I do think the big H is a huge reason my parents' generation and my Boomer generation were cowed, and I'm pretty confident the power of that is fading fast for younger generations coming up. At some point it's going to flip to where self-preservation, pride, courage, etc., won't have that looming internal barrier.
In 14 years, well less than a generation, we'll be at the 100th anniversary of the start of WW2.
I have 2 sons in their early 20s, and they have absolutely zero knowledge of the Holocaust, and less care.
When they are in their late 30s, any Jew demanding special treatment from them because of the holocaust will be laughed at. Might as well demand special treatment because of the plague in the 14th century.
The Jews have less than a generation to use that as leverage. After that, fuck 'em. From where I sit, even now, fuck 'em.
A bleak but beautiful synopsis, as ever, Woes. Race is such a brutally obvious truth that, in a way, one needs to overcome one's polite, respectable middle-class sensitivities in order to be able not only to acknowledge it but celebrate it as a cultural dynamic.
As a 'boomer' I grew up with this distaste for race as a reality. My parents fought/worked in (and for) the '39-45 war; subsequently the Holocaust was revealed to an already shell-shocked culture, and the mass emotion that then issued from the middle-classes (who make up the vast majority of the normie bloc) was that race would be allowed (consciously or unconsciously) to slip gently out of our cultural purview: "oh well, darling, I don't think we need to bother about all that stuff, do you? We're all brothers and sisters under the skin, after all!' (etc, etc.) Of course, two generations of vicious deconstruction of European identity was then unleashed on us via academia, media and entertainment and we went from forgetting race, to denying it, then reviling it, then outlawing it.
This kind of cultural, racial amnesia is, as we all now know, a devastating phenomenon: once suffered, it is, a long way back for a race and the atomised individuals that comprise it. That said if I, a deeply sensitive, little Lord Fauntleroy 'boomer' lyric poet can do it anyone can! - I jest, of course, insofar as the spirit of the true poet is, whilst deeply sensitive to the nuances of the human experience, also steely, enduring, impassioned and unashamedly warlike when the cause of a people's freedom is threatened. As William Blake famously declared: "Bring me my bow of burning gold! Bring me my arrows of desire! I shall not sleep - Oh clouds unfold! Bring me my chariot of fire!"
We're all going to need that attitude if we're to survive - which we will, of course.
There's plenty of intellectual middle class people who are fanatic leftists. It's not intelligence that's the deciding factor, it's a strange kind of autism that dictates this world view imo.
So, you’re optimistic about the long-term trajectory—but what kind of timeline are we looking at before we see a systemic shift back toward European sovereignty and the emergence of non-subverted governance?
Devon Stack often discusses the idea of raising the next generations of “John Connors” in more rural areas while gradually fostering economic independence. But realistically, are we expecting the next 20–50 years to be a period of continued decline? Or does this "meritocratic" shift signal a tangible improvement in the daily life of you and me within a foreseeable timeframe? UK mainstream adverts are still ~60% black with inter mixing in more or less everything.
I tend to believe that much of the British middle class has fully internalised this kind if propaganda and will continue to do so until they fade into irrelevance as genetic dead ends. Maybe I'm being pessimistic but covid showed the level of passivity among them.
Finally, with younger generations in Britain increasingly relocating to Southeast Asia or Eastern Europe, many are attempting to establish their own expat communities. Given that significant change seems unlikely in the short term, could this approach be a viable strategy over the next 10–20 years? Or is it ultimately just another temporary escape?
I apologise for not replying to you at the time. It was because, off the cuff, I couldn't think of answers to your questions.
I think the timeframe is between 50 and 100 years.
- America has to withdraw as "world policeman" in order that European countries will be able to take control of their own situations.
- Then, in each country the economic situation has to worsen so that people cannot distract themselves with luxury. This is already happening with younger generations nowhere near as comfortable as, say, the Boomers, with many middle-class kids destined for low-end jobs and social irrelevance.
- Then, the natives in each country need to FEEL existentially and personally threatened by the foreigners. This is already happening, but they can always delude themselves by white flighting away from the problem, and meantime the media/education assure them that they are the problem, not the foreigners, and for now it is advantageous for ordinary people to acquiesce to that, since they don't really suffer by it. That is what needs to change. They need to genuinely suffer due to diversity. I think that is inevitably on the way.
- We need to run out of places to "white flight" to. This is already happening, since the authorities don't want us to have any idylls left, any places where we can escape from diversity. However, what this means is that we are no longer able to delude ourselves. Again this is already happening, with violence against natives in small cities, towns and even villages now a regular occurrence, almost daily.
- In each country, one (just one) political party has to: a) be genuinely nativist, b) be competent, c) survive initial attempts to keep it down. If it does so, it eventually reaches a size that it can no longer be ignored or demonised. (This would be the AfD in Germany.) At that point, a feedback loop occurs whereby the Establishment reacts to that party's existence and prominence by going hysterical against it. This only makes the party grow even more since the public see it as genuinely anathema to the Establishment that they despise. But, going by the Establishment's own ideology of democratic liberalism, it cannot abolish or ban the party, so its hands are tied. The Establishment is locked in a spiral of demonising the party and thus empowering it. The way the Establishment avoids this problem is by creating dummy "nativist" figures with which it can mislead the oiks (Tommy Robinson), or else it finds some legal technicality to fell genuinely nativist figures and parties. The more financial backing those have, the better they will be able to resist such lawfare from a dying Establishment.
- That party then gets into power and begins incentivising foreigners to return home. Their reactions to this range from acquiescence (many will take the money and go) to murderous violence (many will do anything rather than return home). The latter will embolden the natives, both electorally and in other ways which will be less pleasant.
As I said, I would estimate 50-100 years for all of this to play out.
One of the most coherent, well-thought-out visions for a realistic path forward that I’ve encountered. It’d make a fantastic article or podcast stream (like in the Grams of Woes). We don’t see nearly enough emphasis on a positive plans for the future. Sure, there’s plenty of in-depth analysis showing how things are falling apart, but too little about the roadmap ahead.
The UK is fucked. It's lost. Fallen. They allow their daughters to be raped and killed (and served as food!!) by savages, and do nothing. The Reconquista will not happen there. The faith defended by the King of England will be islam, very soon.
On the other hand, do you think the Hungarians will allow themselves to be subjugated by Muslims again, ever? After what they went through? Or any of the Balkan Christians? Or the Russians? My God, the things the Russians will do.
Compare Victor Orban to Keith Sturmer. Compare Vlad to him. Lol.
There will be stupendous religious wars fought in central and then western Europe and then the middle east later this century, or early in the next. And at the end of those wars Islam will be nothing but a bad memory. There will not be a Muslim left breathing on this planet. This will, of course be A Very
Good Thing.
My only regret is that I'm fairly old now and at best I'll be relegated to executing prisoners. Masses of prisoners. One can only hope.
It is obvious that you are a thoughtful commenter, so I won't ban you, but please refrain from saying that Britain - my homeland - is fucked, lost, fallen, etc. Think about what you're doing to British people when you say those words.
I am grateful for your participation here, but please remember that I am not some tourist who can just switch to another country. Britain is everything to me.
The British communities existing outside of Britain are retirees congregating into a township. In Central Europe the young British are expatriated by their companies and do not form communities: they rather live in general expat circles for 3-5 years until the next assignment.
Biden removed more immigrants because he admitted TEN MILLION ILLEGALS, a percentage of which still had to be removed for blatant criminality, and Trump’s invoking of Title 42 during Covid crashed the number of illegal entries. Most of Trump’s executive orders will be upheld by conservative federal courts and the conservative Supreme Court, including birthright citizenship, as The Federalist Society, which nominates most federal and Supreme Court appointees, will attest.
Regarding the 14th amendment, you're.errmm.. wrong.
It has been subjected to misinterpretation by those who benefit from that misinterpretatio.
When it goes to the current supreme court they will (almost) certainly interpret it according to how it is written, and birthright citizenship in the US will be over for ever. No constitutional change required.
Insightful piece with an accurate account of who wields power in the West. I read this before but have returned to it having heard your name dropped in a piece by Zander’s Substack, and I have to give this a 10/10. Sorry I cannot become a paid subscriber at the moment and hope that changes in the future.
My eyes are on the West, under small hat control, and Russia Iran China. There is some difficulty getting to Iran with friends like that. Will a false flag once again happen like the past it’s hard to say. But with Iran having broken the Iron Dome, the small hats MUST finish them off as they are an existential threat. An existential threat for them is anywhere on earth as they manage to piss natives off where ever they go.
For years I have heard references to “international banking and finance” as the end-all be-all explanation of why we are where we are (and of course a traditional source of you-know-who’s power) and I see this again in this essay.
However, I have never seen any source actually dive into this, with names, money flows, etc. to explain HOW exactly banking can cause the rot we see. I don’t see even an indirect link between the cat ladies destroying my local rural libraries and “finance.” Am I missing something huge here? Woes, have you written more about this somewhere else, or know of other good resources to learn more? Thank you if you’re reading this.
(Also, I’ve read “A History of Central Banking and the Enslavement of Mankind” and it didn’t help. The book is a little kooky and certainly didn’t draw any clear causality between our current state and banking)
https://x.com/TimothyGet/status/1912970259901841776
I would sum it up as two steps forward and one step back, albeit that the step back is largely superficial.
Technology and AI will, to a large extent, replace those jobs performed by competent men. The technocratic control grid will be used to govern the people. I don't think future warfare will require 1000s of highly-trained intelligent people - just a few hundred to control the masses and strategise.
I may be charged with being a contrarian—a blackpilled doomer, if you wish—and that’s ok with me. But I really don’t believe that the woke has been put away at all. I believe it is merely a rhetorical ploy; the establishment right signalled that the woke era is over, which the dissident/online right then picked up and broadcasted to its audience. At that point, the establishment left and its dissident/online faction learned what’s happening on the other side, and then, in turn, responded to it. After all, reaction is symbiotic. And voilà, the narrative, not the reality, became the focus and current state of affairs.
Despite all of the claims circulating about, my eyes and cognitive functioning tell me that the woke is very much present and still growing. It’s easy to see and understand, if one just looks beyond that superficial claim.
Yes. Being "put away" does not mean "abandoned". It just means "temporarily hidden, as a matter of convenience".
The woke banshees, goblins, demons and vampires are still out there, and they still want to destroy us.
I actually agree with you. It's very complicated, and I wanted this essay to show "one side of the situation", with others in the future showing other sides. For example, this essay is really about America. In Europe, and certainly Britain, I think the situation with "woke" is very different. As long as Starmer's Labour are in power, I don't think we will see much real change unless it is forced on them by America. Also, the people in the media will still believe all the same stuff as in 2020. I could imagine them biting the bullet and accepting that they need to be more subtle and less preachy, but no more than that.
I think you're wrong about Kalergi Zionism. You seem to be overlooking the profound differences which separate whites from all other races, and which, unfortunately, make us uniquely susceptible to Jewish manipulation. Jews will be sunk without whites, and all their hatred and fanaticism isn't enough to blind them to this fact. This is not to say they always judge their own interests well, but I believe their instincts tell them that the mixed Afro-Asian Zionist will never be a thing.
What "white forces" will repel this? I can't think of a single one.
Are young UK White expats REALLY going to SE Asia or E. Europe and forming self replicating communities?
I'd be thunderstruck if that were true.
Any in E Europe will just melt into the local population if they hopefully find local women (or men)
The ones going to SE Asia are 99.99% men and the vast majority of those are just there to fuck the various local Orientals in a decades long hedonistic bender ending with each of their genetic oblivions.
In two recent trips in which my wife and I were driven to our destination by non-White drivers, I involved myself in general conversation with them regarding the state of affairs in the World. In some ways I felt as if I was talking to someone from 40 years ago. From these drivers there was no, "I have nothing against transgender people, but..." or "we're all just people, we're all the same deep down", rather these people spoke their mind. I even felt quite comfortable talking about the Jews to them, no problems.
Putting aside the long term problem that Whites tend to be against their own heritage and identity, and these non-Whites tend to be very proud of their people and heritage, it did make me think that these people could be really, really woken up to the Jews and their agenda. From there I decided to present to people the idea of humanity (including us people of European blood) defending ourselves against the Jews and all the agendas they push. This will take some pressure off Whites and place it upon the Jews, who we can link to the globalist agenda.
Just my thoughts, and I understand that I focus on the Jewish problem more than most.
I think if we take genetics seriously, then the White soy boys of today are just a step away from the public schoiolboys who blew sepoys out of cannons last century, from the Aryan steppe-dwellers who were howling berserkers millennia before that. There just hasn't been enough time for that to change on any fundamental level - the social conditioning is superficial in the long run.
Thie question is when will the bloody Saxon awake? What will it take? I do think the big H is a huge reason my parents' generation and my Boomer generation were cowed, and I'm pretty confident the power of that is fading fast for younger generations coming up. At some point it's going to flip to where self-preservation, pride, courage, etc., won't have that looming internal barrier.
But how much longer Lord, how much longer? :(
In 14 years, well less than a generation, we'll be at the 100th anniversary of the start of WW2.
I have 2 sons in their early 20s, and they have absolutely zero knowledge of the Holocaust, and less care.
When they are in their late 30s, any Jew demanding special treatment from them because of the holocaust will be laughed at. Might as well demand special treatment because of the plague in the 14th century.
The Jews have less than a generation to use that as leverage. After that, fuck 'em. From where I sit, even now, fuck 'em.
Great article. We are following the same trajectory, but a little bit behind America demographically. Farage can definitely get behind Kalergi-ism.
A bleak but beautiful synopsis, as ever, Woes. Race is such a brutally obvious truth that, in a way, one needs to overcome one's polite, respectable middle-class sensitivities in order to be able not only to acknowledge it but celebrate it as a cultural dynamic.
As a 'boomer' I grew up with this distaste for race as a reality. My parents fought/worked in (and for) the '39-45 war; subsequently the Holocaust was revealed to an already shell-shocked culture, and the mass emotion that then issued from the middle-classes (who make up the vast majority of the normie bloc) was that race would be allowed (consciously or unconsciously) to slip gently out of our cultural purview: "oh well, darling, I don't think we need to bother about all that stuff, do you? We're all brothers and sisters under the skin, after all!' (etc, etc.) Of course, two generations of vicious deconstruction of European identity was then unleashed on us via academia, media and entertainment and we went from forgetting race, to denying it, then reviling it, then outlawing it.
This kind of cultural, racial amnesia is, as we all now know, a devastating phenomenon: once suffered, it is, a long way back for a race and the atomised individuals that comprise it. That said if I, a deeply sensitive, little Lord Fauntleroy 'boomer' lyric poet can do it anyone can! - I jest, of course, insofar as the spirit of the true poet is, whilst deeply sensitive to the nuances of the human experience, also steely, enduring, impassioned and unashamedly warlike when the cause of a people's freedom is threatened. As William Blake famously declared: "Bring me my bow of burning gold! Bring me my arrows of desire! I shall not sleep - Oh clouds unfold! Bring me my chariot of fire!"
We're all going to need that attitude if we're to survive - which we will, of course.
There's plenty of intellectual middle class people who are fanatic leftists. It's not intelligence that's the deciding factor, it's a strange kind of autism that dictates this world view imo.
Nice one Colin.
So, you’re optimistic about the long-term trajectory—but what kind of timeline are we looking at before we see a systemic shift back toward European sovereignty and the emergence of non-subverted governance?
Devon Stack often discusses the idea of raising the next generations of “John Connors” in more rural areas while gradually fostering economic independence. But realistically, are we expecting the next 20–50 years to be a period of continued decline? Or does this "meritocratic" shift signal a tangible improvement in the daily life of you and me within a foreseeable timeframe? UK mainstream adverts are still ~60% black with inter mixing in more or less everything.
I tend to believe that much of the British middle class has fully internalised this kind if propaganda and will continue to do so until they fade into irrelevance as genetic dead ends. Maybe I'm being pessimistic but covid showed the level of passivity among them.
Finally, with younger generations in Britain increasingly relocating to Southeast Asia or Eastern Europe, many are attempting to establish their own expat communities. Given that significant change seems unlikely in the short term, could this approach be a viable strategy over the next 10–20 years? Or is it ultimately just another temporary escape?
I apologise for not replying to you at the time. It was because, off the cuff, I couldn't think of answers to your questions.
I think the timeframe is between 50 and 100 years.
- America has to withdraw as "world policeman" in order that European countries will be able to take control of their own situations.
- Then, in each country the economic situation has to worsen so that people cannot distract themselves with luxury. This is already happening with younger generations nowhere near as comfortable as, say, the Boomers, with many middle-class kids destined for low-end jobs and social irrelevance.
- Then, the natives in each country need to FEEL existentially and personally threatened by the foreigners. This is already happening, but they can always delude themselves by white flighting away from the problem, and meantime the media/education assure them that they are the problem, not the foreigners, and for now it is advantageous for ordinary people to acquiesce to that, since they don't really suffer by it. That is what needs to change. They need to genuinely suffer due to diversity. I think that is inevitably on the way.
- We need to run out of places to "white flight" to. This is already happening, since the authorities don't want us to have any idylls left, any places where we can escape from diversity. However, what this means is that we are no longer able to delude ourselves. Again this is already happening, with violence against natives in small cities, towns and even villages now a regular occurrence, almost daily.
- In each country, one (just one) political party has to: a) be genuinely nativist, b) be competent, c) survive initial attempts to keep it down. If it does so, it eventually reaches a size that it can no longer be ignored or demonised. (This would be the AfD in Germany.) At that point, a feedback loop occurs whereby the Establishment reacts to that party's existence and prominence by going hysterical against it. This only makes the party grow even more since the public see it as genuinely anathema to the Establishment that they despise. But, going by the Establishment's own ideology of democratic liberalism, it cannot abolish or ban the party, so its hands are tied. The Establishment is locked in a spiral of demonising the party and thus empowering it. The way the Establishment avoids this problem is by creating dummy "nativist" figures with which it can mislead the oiks (Tommy Robinson), or else it finds some legal technicality to fell genuinely nativist figures and parties. The more financial backing those have, the better they will be able to resist such lawfare from a dying Establishment.
- That party then gets into power and begins incentivising foreigners to return home. Their reactions to this range from acquiescence (many will take the money and go) to murderous violence (many will do anything rather than return home). The latter will embolden the natives, both electorally and in other ways which will be less pleasant.
As I said, I would estimate 50-100 years for all of this to play out.
One of the most coherent, well-thought-out visions for a realistic path forward that I’ve encountered. It’d make a fantastic article or podcast stream (like in the Grams of Woes). We don’t see nearly enough emphasis on a positive plans for the future. Sure, there’s plenty of in-depth analysis showing how things are falling apart, but too little about the roadmap ahead.
The UK is fucked. It's lost. Fallen. They allow their daughters to be raped and killed (and served as food!!) by savages, and do nothing. The Reconquista will not happen there. The faith defended by the King of England will be islam, very soon.
On the other hand, do you think the Hungarians will allow themselves to be subjugated by Muslims again, ever? After what they went through? Or any of the Balkan Christians? Or the Russians? My God, the things the Russians will do.
Compare Victor Orban to Keith Sturmer. Compare Vlad to him. Lol.
There will be stupendous religious wars fought in central and then western Europe and then the middle east later this century, or early in the next. And at the end of those wars Islam will be nothing but a bad memory. There will not be a Muslim left breathing on this planet. This will, of course be A Very
Good Thing.
My only regret is that I'm fairly old now and at best I'll be relegated to executing prisoners. Masses of prisoners. One can only hope.
It is obvious that you are a thoughtful commenter, so I won't ban you, but please refrain from saying that Britain - my homeland - is fucked, lost, fallen, etc. Think about what you're doing to British people when you say those words.
I am grateful for your participation here, but please remember that I am not some tourist who can just switch to another country. Britain is everything to me.
The British communities existing outside of Britain are retirees congregating into a township. In Central Europe the young British are expatriated by their companies and do not form communities: they rather live in general expat circles for 3-5 years until the next assignment.
Biden removed more immigrants because he admitted TEN MILLION ILLEGALS, a percentage of which still had to be removed for blatant criminality, and Trump’s invoking of Title 42 during Covid crashed the number of illegal entries. Most of Trump’s executive orders will be upheld by conservative federal courts and the conservative Supreme Court, including birthright citizenship, as The Federalist Society, which nominates most federal and Supreme Court appointees, will attest.
Regarding the 14th amendment, you're.errmm.. wrong.
It has been subjected to misinterpretation by those who benefit from that misinterpretatio.
When it goes to the current supreme court they will (almost) certainly interpret it according to how it is written, and birthright citizenship in the US will be over for ever. No constitutional change required.