Mostly I am liberal and inquisitive, but I recognise that hierarchy will only be respected by the masses if they are made to respect it, so despite my liberal nature I believe there is a need for an elite to pronounce upon what is good and bad, better and worse. Where hierarchy is not maintained, everything falls apart as the low, painfully aware of its lowness, attempts to deny it by attacking the high. The result is chaos and dishonesty. This seems to be a recurring pattern: people need hierarchy, yet by nature reject it on sight until compelled to accept it. But accept it they must, because the alternative is the appetites of the man on the Clapham omnibus, who is unfortunately quite dull. (But, in our age, even his so-called betters are no better.)
"I believe there is a need for an elite to pronounce upon what is good and bad, better and worse."
Not even the monarchy does this now. Pomp and ceremony still comes out occasionally, but how often do we see them pretending (I hope) to enjoy the Royal Variety Show, or the tosh that has accompanied events like the Platinum Jubilee? Some people actually believe that such debasement is virtuous, and that the royals should be 'more like us', and this tends to be people who purport to like the royal family. Do they want them to be royal or not? Very likely they have not considered very deeply what royalty is meant to represent. The royals are human and it would, frankly, be strange if they didn't enjoy some forms of low culture in private. However, they, and anyone who comes from a noble or high class background, should embody that as fully as possible. Nobody else can.
Rather shamefully, I must admit to having never attempted to cross the roundabout and visit it on foot, though I have driven past it a hundred times. Rather than a mere curiosity, it is hard to imagine standing among the window-less walls and see the sky above where there should be a roof, and modern ugliness from almost - but not quite every - angle round about, and not feel a strong sense of grief for WWII and what was ushered in afterwards. What happened to us as a people can be summed up in a word: loss.
man is born unequal and diverse, but hierarchy, nationhood, etc. were tools by which he could become more or less equal to his "volk commrade". When people remember the reasons which hiearchy is for, they will love it, call for it, and fight for it.
As for inequality within one race, so too for inequality between all races, this will become a thing of the past, if a truly folkish hierarchy is established over all peoples; a "global federation of national socialist states" if you would. N.S. is in fact, an ideology, universal, and for export.
We will win this new age of freedom, and cast down oligarchy, by recognizing both equality in inequality and inequality in equality, as a sort of "Trinitarian" reality, of racial ecology, a union, and dynamic, within nature and within the state based on its laws. (Nature is like an RTS game, the races may be different, start off with different abilities and dispositions, but they all have the potential to be powerful in their own respects. -if they adopt real socialism, which is real nationalism.)
And that is, I believe, why the doctrine of equality is really being pushed. It is a mirage. Nobody really believes in it - except (ironically) the people whom it is intended to destroy: Europeans.
A very concise statement about the entire issue Woes. Will we collectively wake up, or go gentle into that good night?
"I believe there is a need for an elite to pronounce upon what is good and bad, better and worse."
Not even the monarchy does this now. Pomp and ceremony still comes out occasionally, but how often do we see them pretending (I hope) to enjoy the Royal Variety Show, or the tosh that has accompanied events like the Platinum Jubilee? Some people actually believe that such debasement is virtuous, and that the royals should be 'more like us', and this tends to be people who purport to like the royal family. Do they want them to be royal or not? Very likely they have not considered very deeply what royalty is meant to represent. The royals are human and it would, frankly, be strange if they didn't enjoy some forms of low culture in private. However, they, and anyone who comes from a noble or high class background, should embody that as fully as possible. Nobody else can.
For anyone interested, the church in the photo used in the article is Charles Church in Plymouth.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Church,_Plymouth#Destruction_and_recent_history_1941-2002
Rather shamefully, I must admit to having never attempted to cross the roundabout and visit it on foot, though I have driven past it a hundred times. Rather than a mere curiosity, it is hard to imagine standing among the window-less walls and see the sky above where there should be a roof, and modern ugliness from almost - but not quite every - angle round about, and not feel a strong sense of grief for WWII and what was ushered in afterwards. What happened to us as a people can be summed up in a word: loss.
man is born unequal and diverse, but hierarchy, nationhood, etc. were tools by which he could become more or less equal to his "volk commrade". When people remember the reasons which hiearchy is for, they will love it, call for it, and fight for it.
As for inequality within one race, so too for inequality between all races, this will become a thing of the past, if a truly folkish hierarchy is established over all peoples; a "global federation of national socialist states" if you would. N.S. is in fact, an ideology, universal, and for export.
We will win this new age of freedom, and cast down oligarchy, by recognizing both equality in inequality and inequality in equality, as a sort of "Trinitarian" reality, of racial ecology, a union, and dynamic, within nature and within the state based on its laws. (Nature is like an RTS game, the races may be different, start off with different abilities and dispositions, but they all have the potential to be powerful in their own respects. -if they adopt real socialism, which is real nationalism.)
And that is, I believe, why the doctrine of equality is really being pushed. It is a mirage. Nobody really believes in it - except (ironically) the people whom it is intended to destroy: Europeans.
A very concise statement about the entire issue Woes. Will we collectively wake up, or go gentle into that good night?
"...the ethnic group disfigured by mass immigration..."
Good description.
All things bright and beautiful,
All creatures great and small,
All things wise and wonderful,
The Lord God made them all.
This verse is now usually removed
The rich man in his castle,
The poor man at his gate,
God made them, high or lowly,
And ordered their estate.
All things bright and beautiful,
All creatures great and small,
All things wise and wonderful,
The Lord God made them all.
This verse is now usually removed
The rich man in his castle,
The poor man at his gate,
God made them, high or lowly,
And ordered their estate.