The situation in Britain now is so perverse that, if you could convey it to people from a century ago, I think they, after getting over the disbelief and astonishment and accepting that this really was true, would assume it could not have come about by chance.
Just as an FYI, I ran the numbers in 2008. By then Roe had resulted in something like 43K abortion, IIRC. Assuming 90% of women who aborted their kids were democrats, 75% of kids voted as their parents, 2.1 total fertility rate, 49% female births, extrapolating those 43K abortions to the 2020 election resulted in 20M fewer D voters in 2020. Are you going to tell me you would have been OK with 20M more Ds?
Such a powerful piece of writing - thank you. It all feels so overwhelmingly hopeless at times. I was diagnosed with a Grade 4 brain tumour earlier this year - that forces a person to think about their own mortality. What has been the point of it all? Like many traditional, conservative people I got married and had children as I believed that was the right thing to do. To bring them up with a strong sense of their racial identity and history. You hope that will be enough. But then one day you realise the power, the reach and scale, of the enemy. For me, that happened when I supported a 12 year old ‘grooming gang’ victim’ (I was a parent-governor at the school the girl attended). The moment you realise that the entire apparatus of state is colluding with the rape and trafficking of children, isn’t one you forget. Is the fate of my own children to be murder or miscegenation? - the ‘predator class’ (as James Delingpole calls them) wants us all blended to a gloop without identity. All to plan, as you detail Woes.
Sometimes I envy the classic boomer response to the future - ‘ Well, I’ll be dead by then so I don’t care!’ It hurts to care about this stuff. I recently made a short video on some of the victims of diversity - there were so, so many that I lost count https://youtu.be/qpviz1uHRkM?si=ACRBEn4388nXPvYm . I wonder did that 1950’s civil servant Woes alludes to, implementing the beginnings of end of ‘the British’, ever envisage such horror? But if you will the end, you must will the means.
The wheels have come off. Capital flight and brain drain will lead to the rapid implosion of the British economy. As bad as it is now, it is going to get a lot worse.
What happens when foreign tourist give up on England? I see this happening now. That will contribute to massive tax revenue losses. How will Starmer pay the wages of the secuirty apparatus with the native tax base having largely fled abroad and foreign toursits avoiding the UK? I don't see migrant welfare recipients from the third world replacing skilled workers, do you? Does anyone, really?
How will the 'new British' maintain an already creaking first world infrastructure that is already falling apart?
I don't even want to think about what England will look like in a year. It's going to be unbelievably bad.
We are now beyond the point of saying 'I'll be dead by then.' 'Then' is now.
However, I wouldn't give up just yet.
History tells us (those who bother to study it and no, not the BBC version of it) that the world is full of surprises. Things rarely, if ever, go to plan.
First of all, there are several 'economies' within the 'British economy'. And advocates for 'local rule' - White 'nationalist' advocates - need to start thinking in terms of *virtual separtism*. Figure out how to have your own money, your own banking. Figure out where your energy might come from and how much energy you need to survive. Also figure out what is going to take to make sure that the available energy is directed to racially-minded Whites (or non-White allies) and not non-Whites or hostile Whites'. The models to look at are ecology and epidemiology, specifically the effective responses to habitat invasion by invasive species as well as 'pest elimination'.
Excellent advice. The reinstated Australian Natives Association provides a fraternal network for white Australians. Support for each other in a challenging environment - Our Own for Our Own.
First of all, nullfication and resistance *always* works. At the very least it forces your enemy to work much much harder than they would otherwise. And most asymmetric conflicts are not won with 'decisive battles' but due to the exhaustion of one party before the other.
Nuclear weapons are irrelevant. If they get used, the game's over. The nuclear cat will have been let out of the bag and *every* nuclear weapon will likely be detonated.
Qaddafi's situation was the result of demanding to be rewarded for doing what the global elite did not want him doing in the first place (stopping immigration into Europe from Africa).
In America, the military is already outgunned and out-ammo'd. Using the military against any population in North America would give the para-military Right the outcome they have always desired: A shooting war in North America.
So I think the threat of military intervention is grossly over-estimated.
America is no longer Little Rock in 1955 or Kent State in 1968.
No one on the Right believes in 'peaceful coexistence' or 'peaceful protest' anymore.
We know we're the enemy and it's just a matter of time before everyone else understands which side they're on.
For myself, I want to be on the side of the people who have access to oil and agricultural products.
You sound like a Hopium Addict. The game has already been over and the entire Jewish Eschaton demands that they use Nuclear Weapons, brvh. Nullification doesn't work because they just pave your village over with chemical rockets.
You. Hope. Too. Much. Nothing good will ever happen and they'll Nuke The World because that's how Jews operate.
Do you think ethnic amd cultural enclaves similar to the Amish, Mennonites, Russian Old Believers, etc might be a long term solution? Not exactly like that but something similar. We could exclude ourselves from the cultural and racial degradation happening in the rest of the country but not give the state any reason to crush us. For centuries, these groups have managed to keep themselves separate to an amazing degree in America.
“Do you think ethnic amd cultural enclaves similar to the Amish, Mennonites, Russian Old Believers, etc might be a long term solution”? For the English, Quite possibly if Heritage British relocated to the British Isles. Say Isle of Man, inner / outer Hebrides, Orkney, Shetland, etc. The weather isn’t great by any means, but that would be a plus to help keep the invaders at bay. One thing I noticed while exploring them awhile back was that many of the residents I met were military veterans, which was interesting. Yes…..Definitely possibilities.
And this is what will eventually happen. I see breakaway regions: politically independent states, and the eventual reconquest of the entire country when the welfare system collapses along with the collapse of the supply chain.
The Amish are for all intents and purposes pets. They are allowed to continue because their towns are cute and white people like their furniture. The non-whites? They will force the Amish to either arm themselves and accept the reality of combat, or die for their current beliefs.
Any ethnic enclave of whites that has been allowed to continue is allowed only because they are seen as non-threatening. A problem that can be mopped up with ease at a later date
"Any political party that would do anything about any of this is refused the right to stand in elections, debanked, demonised and, in most cases, destroyed." This is not entirely true. The Homeland Party stands on an unapologetic ethnonationalist platform. It is a registered political party and so far has not been targeted by the regime. If you don't already, it's worth following them on X for slightly more nuanced takes than most nationalist/'far right' commentators are providing.
'Ethnonationalism' is just liberalism in 'nationalist' drag. Affirming the 'right' of non-Whites diffuses the political and economic interests into the interests of every other race on the planet. It's dead end and that's why the authorities turn a blind eye to it. I'd be concerned it's a 'honey-pot' that exists solely for the purpose of creating as 'paper trail' of 'concerned Whites' that can used against them now or at a later date.
If an organization is not wholly and completely dedicated to asserting the specific and unique interests of Whites, it's just going to end up betraying them in the long run.
My assumption is that the Homeland Party is bankrolled by jews.
No. It's safer to (a) be aware of the long history of counterintelligence operations by 'national' internal security systems and (b) take the appropriate precautions. In the USA, almost every 'white power' organization has been a front for internal security.
I am trying to be diplomatic. However if you're going to force me to be open about it... Several figures in Homeland have publicly (and pointlessly) disparaged me, and my experience tells me that people given to such behaviour are not good at negotiating and navigating - or even entering - the world of politics. There are some in Homeland who seem better than that, and I hope that those more reasonable people prevail and the party gets somewhere. If you want to invest in it, I'm not going to discourage you - but don't expect me to tag along.
Excellent piece. Resist. Keep yourself and your family safe, but resist. Create a modern clan that looks after one another. Seize power locally. Speak the truth.
I found this unrven. Much to agree with but also disappointing. The personal swipe at Churchil was pathetic, petty, self-indulgent.
Britain''s sovereignty has been eroding since WW1. The US put the halter around Britain's neck via war debts. They used their new found power to bully Britain. Washington negotiated the Anglo-American naval treaty to constrain British naval capacity. The US bullied the UK to destroy the alliance with Japan. This was the first major step towards the end of the European empires in Asia and the context for Chamberlain's policy of appeasement in Europe.
The US tightened the halter in the late 30s. Cash-and-Carry used to exhaust UK finances to breaking point. Then FDR offers Lend Lease to keep the war going. Cash-and-Carry implemented by Joseph Kennedy....deeply hostile to UK, mobbed up and connected to the US banks that financed the trans-Atlantic petro-chemical cartel keen to get rid of Imperial Prefrence (I.G. Farben was a German-American project).
In exchange for Lend Lease the US received R&D that was priceless. War debts compounded and Attllee and co sign off on Anglo-American agreement. Churchill vigorously opposed. He was supported in this opposition by pro-Moscow hard Left within Labour. The agreement was the legal/financial foundation for deindustrialisation on the installment plan.
The transformation of UK governance from a system of national development into one of curated dysfunction followed from the loss of empire. The US deindustrialises it's allies as convenient. The imperial clients who rule are incentivised to destroy the capacity of their peoples. Starmer just the current iteration...he is there to consolidate Blair's legacy. Both Starmer and Blair revolutionary socialists from groups infiltrated by Home Office.
Powell was feared by Washington because he had their number. Powell sabotaged Washington's plans to get Whitehall to send British troops to Vietnam. This made him a very big target from the NATO crowd/fifth column. BTW Powell's speech in '68 was mostly focused on the legal implications of copying US civil rights law.
You make interesting points, but I stand by what I said about Churchill. My thinking is explained by the link I provided at that point in the text, to an Academic Agent stream.
I won't argue. Churchill was controversial. Edward VII thought that he was not a gentleman. He was also a member of Lloyd George's cabinet. No way to live that one down.
I get irritated by the Churchill cult, but find myself getting shirty with his critics too.
I am trying to distil the most salient points of a century of escalating errors of judgement. If you can identify the key turning points it all starts to clarify.
No one throughout history has truly known its direction. The past is strewn with the bodies of who were then “the present.” No one can guarantee the future of anyone. Many of the dystopian memes from literature will bloom. We, the aged, will helplessly watch as the world becomes relatively unrecognizable. Even the global wealthy will be swept up at some point. All the platitudes about how “people are basically ‘good,’” or how “‘progress’ will make things better for all” will be shown in all their falsity. We won’t be using clubs, but we will be beaten and will beat each other. Maybe some little pockets of sanity will briefly survive, but like Genet, we will not be able to escape the hell of each other. “Please ‘all’ and you please none.” ☹️
England will one day pay a heavy price for this man.
When the great catastrophe breaks over the island kingdom, the British people will have him to thank.
He has long been the spokesman for the plutocratic caste that wanted war to destroy Germany. He distinguishes himself from the men behind the scenes only through his obvious cynicism and his unscrupulous contempt for humankind. He wants war for war's sake. War is an end in itself to him.
He wished it, pushed for it, and prepared for it out of a stupid, destructive drive. He is one of those characters of the political underworld who rise through chaos, who announce chaos, who cause chaos. For countless people the war brings vast suffering, for countless children hunger and disease, for countless mothers and women streams of tears. For him, it is no more than a big horse race that he wants to take part in."
Joseph Goebbels' "Churchill" (1941)
Secondly, this;
It is in part this uncertainty that drives the Jews to pursue their goal of world domination more quickly and more consistently. Even Goethe wrote: “The Jew will not spare us.” We can be sure that this is more true today than ever before. In the book by the Jews Zangwill and Roth titled Now and Forever, a conversation reveals what the Jewish world parasite sees as its final goal, world domination [the book referred to is Now and Forever: a Conversation with Mr. Israel Zangwill on the Jew and the Future (New York: R. M. McBride, 1925)]. With all the passion in the Jewish breast, the book tells the story of a Jew out for revenge. He wanders from country to country, gathering his forces, at the head of which he ruins Europe with sadistic horror and lust for destruction, this Europe that will not bow to the Jew, but instead stands in the way of his path to world domination.
G. G. Otto, Der Jude als Weltparasit (Munich: Eher Verlag, 1943)
Keep up the struggle, and NEVER kid yourself that it is not these people who stand behind the destruction.
Now we need a plan of how we get our people to survive. Only good news is from my daughter’s friends, none of them are in mixed relationships. Yes they are struggling to buy a house, are having kids later but they are not race mixing. They may socially talk about being colour blind, reality is they are sticking with our people.
Another way to look at it is that in Northern Ireland in the early 90s we had the worst tit-for-tat killings in the history of the Troubles. We also had the lowering of the horrible metric of the youngest to be shot. There was an unwritten rule to not kill kids under 18 but that started to slip. Many thought a full civil war was going to happen which would be one sided as most Catholics did not own guns.
But then in the space of a year or two talks started to bear fruit. Some years after we had the Belfast Agreement.
I think we have reached the messy part now which will get messier as we head into winter and have the first punishment budget. But we also have parliament back soon which hopefully will help.
We can only lift ourselves out of it but things do progress.
The English need to gun-up and put their government back in Western Civ.
Just as an FYI, I ran the numbers in 2008. By then Roe had resulted in something like 43K abortion, IIRC. Assuming 90% of women who aborted their kids were democrats, 75% of kids voted as their parents, 2.1 total fertility rate, 49% female births, extrapolating those 43K abortions to the 2020 election resulted in 20M fewer D voters in 2020. Are you going to tell me you would have been OK with 20M more Ds?
This is an excellent article summarising the salient problems of our society today.
Such a powerful piece of writing - thank you. It all feels so overwhelmingly hopeless at times. I was diagnosed with a Grade 4 brain tumour earlier this year - that forces a person to think about their own mortality. What has been the point of it all? Like many traditional, conservative people I got married and had children as I believed that was the right thing to do. To bring them up with a strong sense of their racial identity and history. You hope that will be enough. But then one day you realise the power, the reach and scale, of the enemy. For me, that happened when I supported a 12 year old ‘grooming gang’ victim’ (I was a parent-governor at the school the girl attended). The moment you realise that the entire apparatus of state is colluding with the rape and trafficking of children, isn’t one you forget. Is the fate of my own children to be murder or miscegenation? - the ‘predator class’ (as James Delingpole calls them) wants us all blended to a gloop without identity. All to plan, as you detail Woes.
Sometimes I envy the classic boomer response to the future - ‘ Well, I’ll be dead by then so I don’t care!’ It hurts to care about this stuff. I recently made a short video on some of the victims of diversity - there were so, so many that I lost count https://youtu.be/qpviz1uHRkM?si=ACRBEn4388nXPvYm . I wonder did that 1950’s civil servant Woes alludes to, implementing the beginnings of end of ‘the British’, ever envisage such horror? But if you will the end, you must will the means.
I'm very sorry about your medical condition, LoS. You have my very best wishes.
Thank you.
The wheels have come off. Capital flight and brain drain will lead to the rapid implosion of the British economy. As bad as it is now, it is going to get a lot worse.
What happens when foreign tourist give up on England? I see this happening now. That will contribute to massive tax revenue losses. How will Starmer pay the wages of the secuirty apparatus with the native tax base having largely fled abroad and foreign toursits avoiding the UK? I don't see migrant welfare recipients from the third world replacing skilled workers, do you? Does anyone, really?
How will the 'new British' maintain an already creaking first world infrastructure that is already falling apart?
I don't even want to think about what England will look like in a year. It's going to be unbelievably bad.
We are now beyond the point of saying 'I'll be dead by then.' 'Then' is now.
However, I wouldn't give up just yet.
History tells us (those who bother to study it and no, not the BBC version of it) that the world is full of surprises. Things rarely, if ever, go to plan.
Call it gravity.
First of all, there are several 'economies' within the 'British economy'. And advocates for 'local rule' - White 'nationalist' advocates - need to start thinking in terms of *virtual separtism*. Figure out how to have your own money, your own banking. Figure out where your energy might come from and how much energy you need to survive. Also figure out what is going to take to make sure that the available energy is directed to racially-minded Whites (or non-White allies) and not non-Whites or hostile Whites'. The models to look at are ecology and epidemiology, specifically the effective responses to habitat invasion by invasive species as well as 'pest elimination'.
Excellent advice. The reinstated Australian Natives Association provides a fraternal network for white Australians. Support for each other in a challenging environment - Our Own for Our Own.
https://ausnatives.org
"Figure out how to have your own money, your own banking."
Uh-huh, yeah, and also make yourself an awesome crown and declare yourself king.
It's also critical to come up with an awesome name for your new country.
Go to the Tenth Amendment Center website. Look at the most recent 'State of Nullification' report.
What?
No.
Good. It's clear you more of a liability than an asset to any group.
If that kind of thing ever worked, then why did Qaddafi get stabbed in the ass?
You forget the five eyes still have thermonuclear weapons.
First of all, nullfication and resistance *always* works. At the very least it forces your enemy to work much much harder than they would otherwise. And most asymmetric conflicts are not won with 'decisive battles' but due to the exhaustion of one party before the other.
Nuclear weapons are irrelevant. If they get used, the game's over. The nuclear cat will have been let out of the bag and *every* nuclear weapon will likely be detonated.
Qaddafi's situation was the result of demanding to be rewarded for doing what the global elite did not want him doing in the first place (stopping immigration into Europe from Africa).
In America, the military is already outgunned and out-ammo'd. Using the military against any population in North America would give the para-military Right the outcome they have always desired: A shooting war in North America.
So I think the threat of military intervention is grossly over-estimated.
America is no longer Little Rock in 1955 or Kent State in 1968.
No one on the Right believes in 'peaceful coexistence' or 'peaceful protest' anymore.
We know we're the enemy and it's just a matter of time before everyone else understands which side they're on.
For myself, I want to be on the side of the people who have access to oil and agricultural products.
You sound like a Hopium Addict. The game has already been over and the entire Jewish Eschaton demands that they use Nuclear Weapons, brvh. Nullification doesn't work because they just pave your village over with chemical rockets.
You. Hope. Too. Much. Nothing good will ever happen and they'll Nuke The World because that's how Jews operate.
Ashes and Echoes.
“What happens when foreign tourist give up on England?”
When shopping for transatlantic flights, I won’t even consider ones that stop in LHR. Off the list of options they go!
Do you think ethnic amd cultural enclaves similar to the Amish, Mennonites, Russian Old Believers, etc might be a long term solution? Not exactly like that but something similar. We could exclude ourselves from the cultural and racial degradation happening in the rest of the country but not give the state any reason to crush us. For centuries, these groups have managed to keep themselves separate to an amazing degree in America.
Cultural enclaves will not be allowed to survive by the new wave of migrants. New countries will have to be created if people expect to survive.
Think: the breakup of Yugoslavia.
I am anticipating a new dark age.
“Do you think ethnic amd cultural enclaves similar to the Amish, Mennonites, Russian Old Believers, etc might be a long term solution”? For the English, Quite possibly if Heritage British relocated to the British Isles. Say Isle of Man, inner / outer Hebrides, Orkney, Shetland, etc. The weather isn’t great by any means, but that would be a plus to help keep the invaders at bay. One thing I noticed while exploring them awhile back was that many of the residents I met were military veterans, which was interesting. Yes…..Definitely possibilities.
And this is what will eventually happen. I see breakaway regions: politically independent states, and the eventual reconquest of the entire country when the welfare system collapses along with the collapse of the supply chain.
London will lose control.
The Amish are for all intents and purposes pets. They are allowed to continue because their towns are cute and white people like their furniture. The non-whites? They will force the Amish to either arm themselves and accept the reality of combat, or die for their current beliefs.
Any ethnic enclave of whites that has been allowed to continue is allowed only because they are seen as non-threatening. A problem that can be mopped up with ease at a later date
"Any political party that would do anything about any of this is refused the right to stand in elections, debanked, demonised and, in most cases, destroyed." This is not entirely true. The Homeland Party stands on an unapologetic ethnonationalist platform. It is a registered political party and so far has not been targeted by the regime. If you don't already, it's worth following them on X for slightly more nuanced takes than most nationalist/'far right' commentators are providing.
'Ethnonationalism' is just liberalism in 'nationalist' drag. Affirming the 'right' of non-Whites diffuses the political and economic interests into the interests of every other race on the planet. It's dead end and that's why the authorities turn a blind eye to it. I'd be concerned it's a 'honey-pot' that exists solely for the purpose of creating as 'paper trail' of 'concerned Whites' that can used against them now or at a later date.
If an organization is not wholly and completely dedicated to asserting the specific and unique interests of Whites, it's just going to end up betraying them in the long run.
My assumption is that the Homeland Party is bankrolled by jews.
You will always find Jews if you look hard enough. It's probably safer to do nothing, isn't it?
No. It's safer to (a) be aware of the long history of counterintelligence operations by 'national' internal security systems and (b) take the appropriate precautions. In the USA, almost every 'white power' organization has been a front for internal security.
I'm assuming that Homeland will be destroyed once it gains ground electorally, like the BNP. Obviously I hope to be proven wrong.
I am trying to be diplomatic. However if you're going to force me to be open about it... Several figures in Homeland have publicly (and pointlessly) disparaged me, and my experience tells me that people given to such behaviour are not good at negotiating and navigating - or even entering - the world of politics. There are some in Homeland who seem better than that, and I hope that those more reasonable people prevail and the party gets somewhere. If you want to invest in it, I'm not going to discourage you - but don't expect me to tag along.
Excellent piece. Resist. Keep yourself and your family safe, but resist. Create a modern clan that looks after one another. Seize power locally. Speak the truth.
I found this unrven. Much to agree with but also disappointing. The personal swipe at Churchil was pathetic, petty, self-indulgent.
Britain''s sovereignty has been eroding since WW1. The US put the halter around Britain's neck via war debts. They used their new found power to bully Britain. Washington negotiated the Anglo-American naval treaty to constrain British naval capacity. The US bullied the UK to destroy the alliance with Japan. This was the first major step towards the end of the European empires in Asia and the context for Chamberlain's policy of appeasement in Europe.
The US tightened the halter in the late 30s. Cash-and-Carry used to exhaust UK finances to breaking point. Then FDR offers Lend Lease to keep the war going. Cash-and-Carry implemented by Joseph Kennedy....deeply hostile to UK, mobbed up and connected to the US banks that financed the trans-Atlantic petro-chemical cartel keen to get rid of Imperial Prefrence (I.G. Farben was a German-American project).
In exchange for Lend Lease the US received R&D that was priceless. War debts compounded and Attllee and co sign off on Anglo-American agreement. Churchill vigorously opposed. He was supported in this opposition by pro-Moscow hard Left within Labour. The agreement was the legal/financial foundation for deindustrialisation on the installment plan.
The transformation of UK governance from a system of national development into one of curated dysfunction followed from the loss of empire. The US deindustrialises it's allies as convenient. The imperial clients who rule are incentivised to destroy the capacity of their peoples. Starmer just the current iteration...he is there to consolidate Blair's legacy. Both Starmer and Blair revolutionary socialists from groups infiltrated by Home Office.
Powell was feared by Washington because he had their number. Powell sabotaged Washington's plans to get Whitehall to send British troops to Vietnam. This made him a very big target from the NATO crowd/fifth column. BTW Powell's speech in '68 was mostly focused on the legal implications of copying US civil rights law.
You make interesting points, but I stand by what I said about Churchill. My thinking is explained by the link I provided at that point in the text, to an Academic Agent stream.
I won't argue. Churchill was controversial. Edward VII thought that he was not a gentleman. He was also a member of Lloyd George's cabinet. No way to live that one down.
I get irritated by the Churchill cult, but find myself getting shirty with his critics too.
Brilliant historical perspective. Thank you.
I am trying to distil the most salient points of a century of escalating errors of judgement. If you can identify the key turning points it all starts to clarify.
“…into the heart of an immense darkness.”
Marlowe! Where are you when we need you!
No one throughout history has truly known its direction. The past is strewn with the bodies of who were then “the present.” No one can guarantee the future of anyone. Many of the dystopian memes from literature will bloom. We, the aged, will helplessly watch as the world becomes relatively unrecognizable. Even the global wealthy will be swept up at some point. All the platitudes about how “people are basically ‘good,’” or how “‘progress’ will make things better for all” will be shown in all their falsity. We won’t be using clubs, but we will be beaten and will beat each other. Maybe some little pockets of sanity will briefly survive, but like Genet, we will not be able to escape the hell of each other. “Please ‘all’ and you please none.” ☹️
Brilliant analysis. Please SHARE
Whatever happens. White people need political representation as soon as possible.
Agency might be more useful.
Great piece well written
Two quotes come to mind when contemplating this;
Firstly, this one about Churchill:
England will one day pay a heavy price for this man.
When the great catastrophe breaks over the island kingdom, the British people will have him to thank.
He has long been the spokesman for the plutocratic caste that wanted war to destroy Germany. He distinguishes himself from the men behind the scenes only through his obvious cynicism and his unscrupulous contempt for humankind. He wants war for war's sake. War is an end in itself to him.
He wished it, pushed for it, and prepared for it out of a stupid, destructive drive. He is one of those characters of the political underworld who rise through chaos, who announce chaos, who cause chaos. For countless people the war brings vast suffering, for countless children hunger and disease, for countless mothers and women streams of tears. For him, it is no more than a big horse race that he wants to take part in."
Joseph Goebbels' "Churchill" (1941)
Secondly, this;
It is in part this uncertainty that drives the Jews to pursue their goal of world domination more quickly and more consistently. Even Goethe wrote: “The Jew will not spare us.” We can be sure that this is more true today than ever before. In the book by the Jews Zangwill and Roth titled Now and Forever, a conversation reveals what the Jewish world parasite sees as its final goal, world domination [the book referred to is Now and Forever: a Conversation with Mr. Israel Zangwill on the Jew and the Future (New York: R. M. McBride, 1925)]. With all the passion in the Jewish breast, the book tells the story of a Jew out for revenge. He wanders from country to country, gathering his forces, at the head of which he ruins Europe with sadistic horror and lust for destruction, this Europe that will not bow to the Jew, but instead stands in the way of his path to world domination.
G. G. Otto, Der Jude als Weltparasit (Munich: Eher Verlag, 1943)
Keep up the struggle, and NEVER kid yourself that it is not these people who stand behind the destruction.
Such telling quotes - Goebbels really had the measure of Churchill.
Now we need a plan of how we get our people to survive. Only good news is from my daughter’s friends, none of them are in mixed relationships. Yes they are struggling to buy a house, are having kids later but they are not race mixing. They may socially talk about being colour blind, reality is they are sticking with our people.
That's good news. :)
Have kids now.
Another way to look at it is that in Northern Ireland in the early 90s we had the worst tit-for-tat killings in the history of the Troubles. We also had the lowering of the horrible metric of the youngest to be shot. There was an unwritten rule to not kill kids under 18 but that started to slip. Many thought a full civil war was going to happen which would be one sided as most Catholics did not own guns.
But then in the space of a year or two talks started to bear fruit. Some years after we had the Belfast Agreement.
I think we have reached the messy part now which will get messier as we head into winter and have the first punishment budget. But we also have parliament back soon which hopefully will help.
We can only lift ourselves out of it but things do progress.
The Westminster Parliament is part whipped cur and part snarling, nihilistic cheerleader. Which part do you anticipate helping us?
Blistering and unfortunately also true