The Great Replacement as a Crime (III. Is There Intent?)

Examining whether the Great Replacement is engineered

(Note: this essay is part of a series.)

Change is part of life, and inevitable. But the Great Replacement represents change at a speed and scale that was, within living memory, unimaginable.

Defenders (deniers) of the Great Replacement often say that it is an organic phenomenon, occurring spontaneously as a “gift” of nature. Of course, the alternative to being spontaneous is being engineered. This brings us to “dark smoke-filled rooms where cigar-chomping rich men laugh evilly as they plot elaborate schemes”. That silly caricature is how the public have been trained to think of any kind of “conspiratorial” thinking, any supposition that major events or trends are engineered. The public are expected to believe that everything “just happens”, that people just respond to incentives, which are put in place by other people just responding to incentives, which were just responses to unforeseen natural events, and so on, everything happening organically and without foresight or deliberation, until we arrive at a deep, absolute core of total randomness. But, in order to believe that, you have to believe that the most powerful and well-connected people in the world just… don’t use their power or connections. Is that plausible? Why wouldn’t they?

Furthermore, when we observe that…

• the Great Replacement would not have happened had it not been forced through by a huge range of artificial conditions implemented by government, academia and media. (See chapter 2 for comprehensive - though far from complete - lists of these artificial conditions.)

• the various conditions are replicated across many countries

• they began at around the same time in every one

• this was initially resisted by the natives

• when their complaints were vindicated, the state in every country reacted, not by sensibly dealing with the problems, but by suppressing the complaints

• the arguments used to justify the Great Replacement don’t hold water (“Third World people are good for the economy”, “Third World cultures have much to teach us”, “only Indian people can cook Indian food well”)

• a false history has been manufactured to justify it retrospectively (“we needed them to fill gaps in the labour market”, “the earliest Europeans were black”, “Britain has always been multicultural and multiracial”, “Britain is a nation of immigrants”)

• to hamper honest contemplation and discussion of all of this, a set of contradictory and fallacious ideas is drummed into the public by media, school, university and other state and corporate institutions, so pervasively that many people believe in them like a religion. Even where faith is not achieved, acquiescence is mandated.

… it very much looks like the Great Replacement has indeed been engineered. It was made to happen, against probability and against the will of the people, of many peoples.

---

Special attention should be given to the afore-mentioned “contradictory and fallacious ideas” which are promulgated by officialdom and which obstruct honest discussion. Here is a selection:

• “nobody is born preferring their own race. ‘Racism’ is learned.”

• “race is a fiction, but racial diversity is a strength”

• “all races are functionally identical, but racial diversity is a strength”

• “all cultures are equal, but cultural diversity is a strength”

• “all cultures are equally valuable, but we must be respectful of very different cultures”

• “all cultures are equally valuable, but we must rescue Third World people from their barbaric cultures by welcoming them into our own lands”

• “one rule for everyone else, another for White people”

  

• “multiculturalism benefits White people, but is a punishment they deserve”

• “mass immigration is a response to or consequence of imperialism, even though your country never had an empire”

• “your culture is just a composite of many other cultures, because you buy foreign goods”

  

• “society (rightly) demonises White people, even though they hold all the power in it”

• “ethnic minorities (who need protection) are actually the global majority (who deserve predominance)”

• “your country especially has to accept immigrants because [reason]”

  

• “White people don’t exist, but they are guilty”

• “the Great Replacement isn’t happening, but it’s something to celebrate”

• “coloured people built White countries, but not their own ones”

• “your country was always multiracial, but has a very racist past”

• “the Great Replacement is a myth, but in the future everyone will be mixed-race”

• “the Great Replacement is a myth, unless you approve of it like I do”

  

• “coloured people need to see themselves represented in media, but White people don’t”

• “it’s racist for White actors to play coloured historical figures, but it’s fine for coloured actors to play White historical figures”

• “Africans can do high-end jobs even though their average IQ is 75” / “IQ is measured with Eurocentric standards” / “IQ has no predictive validity”

How could such obvious nonsense become so prevalent, except by being artificially pushed?

That can be done, first and foremost, with money. People will “believe” what they are paid to believe. People will not see that which they are paid not to see. Studies will reach the conclusions desired by the funders.

Beyond financial incentives, also effective are threats of punishment, firing, reputation ruination, and imprisonment.

After enough of this, a new social “consensus” has been imposed, to which people will conform naturally since most have a profound need to adhere to group norms (whatever the norms may be). If you have real influence and use it intelligently, the result of your work will not be that you are constantly influencing the public, but that they are constantly influencing each other with ideas chosen by you; a new “consensus” that is self-perpetuating and self-proliferating. Of course, that does not mean it is invulnerable; there will always be malcontents and rebels questioning it and rejecting it - but you can deal with them.

---

To summarise: the mass immigration of the last fifty years has been accompanied by a relentless and comprehensive programme of indoctrination which will clearly accelerate the demographic replacement of a docile group by (many) aggressive groups, and of maximally weakening the docile group in said contest. The idea that this programme of indoctrination came about by chance, without conscious intent, is absurd.

Any or all of the artificial conditions (see chapter 2) could have been removed at any time, yet they never were, even after their result became obvious (no government could possibly be unaware of the demographic change occurring in its country). Therefore we have to conclude that this result is seen as either desirable or, at the very least, acceptable. But either way, it is known. Therefore, government is certainly guilty of complicity. However, given that it has continually strengthened and reaffirmed these artificial conditions over time, we have to assume that the effect is actively desired, and therefore that there is intent.

To argue otherwise is to argue that a man who continually poisons another man does so without intent to kill. The argument today rests on the fact that the other man hasn’t died (yet). All that means is that the crime has not yet been completed, not that there is no intent to complete it.

The continued enabling of mass immigration coupled with the continued strengthening of the artificial conditions (see chapter 2) and the pushing of the fallacious ideas (listed above) suggests a conscious, deliberate plan of action, with measures reinforcing and amplifying each other, and everything building towards increasing mass non-white immigration into White countries, strengthening the position of non-whites within White countries, weakening White people’s position within their own countries, denying them any ability to protest any of this, and facilitating their perishing either by replacement or absorption by the non-whites. Everything the government has done builds towards that, and nothing it has done - nothing - builds away from that. It is inconceivable that this could happen without intent.

So, yes, it is being done deliberately. The Great Replacement’s effect, even if somehow not predicted in advance (!), is now clearly perceptible. Therefore, to preserve or enhance all of the conditions which bring this effect about is to deliberately, knowingly bring it about.