Thank you for providing yet another succinctly well researched, reasoned and presented analytical essay.
It is now clear and obvious, and has been for sometime, that there is intent and collusion between all the institutions of state and society along with foreing actors to bring about the demise of the Caucasian race in it's entirety, no matter where Caucasians live or how small our numbers. This is an active agenda that has been implemented and perpetuated for many decadess now. We the Caucasian race in all our diverse iterations have been marked for eradication and all the institutions of state and society are working towards this end.
This has seemingly come about for ideological reasons decided in the early 20th century, or at least the active implementation of such an agenda, even if it existed beforehand, but was unable to be implemented.
It has been deemed by the parasitic elites and their useful idiots that we are unworthy and undeserving of life and existence. Therefore everything has been and is being done to emisserate and eliminate us as a race and our varied ethnicities, upto and including the denigration and eradication of our cultures and civilisation. There is a clear and active intent to denigrate and destroy everything concerning us up to and including but not limited to our traditions, taboos and beliefs, even our various forms of art and entertainment has been wilfully and deliberately targeted. The intent is to utterly erase us from the world and history if possible.
Echoes some of what I say in the essay below. Essentially - it's too late. 2TK won't leave until 2029. By then we're at the Schwarschild Radius and a quasi- islamic state. Unless of course normies somehow lose their sky sports and then it will really 'kick off'.
Woes, you are the most lucid writer (and orator) on the dissident right - autistically analytical but with a decidedly unautistic turn of phrase. No wonder Greg Johnson was trying to poach you.
Yeah so this guy called Adolf Hitler was talking about this stuff 100 years ago. A certain group of nepotistic people enjoys forcing other peoples to mix and compete with one another in order to generate behavioural cultural and genetic confusion so their nepotistic power can't be threatened by a cohesive and organised ethnic group with uniform ethical intellectual and behavioural traits
Correct. Except same guy made his own to decision to start a war with other powerful countries at the time (France, Britain, USA, Russia), themselves mostly white and monoracial, that didn't want to be invaded by him.
Morale of the story: nobody really wants anybody else to force anything on them.
He didn't start a war with them nor did he ever aggress against them lol. They declared war on him after Jewish financiers bought out their national leaders' political debt. Remember the entire excuse for World War 2 was the "liberation of Poland", a country the UK and France just gave away to the Soviet Union at the end of the war. WW2 started for the same reason we are being dragged into attacking Iran, Jewish ethnic networks in Western governments.
My one niggardly criticism would be that the 'Great' should be bracketed. If you're going to stick with the term, that has no doubt been manipulated along the way, there's nothing of greatness about it and would be better named 'Foul' or similar.
The Great Replacement as a deliberate plan is the only logical conclusion, and though one could distinguish governmental misfeasance from malfeasance, ultimately they are just two means to the same malicious end.
I never cared whether the GR was the consequence of a very sophisticated, very concrete long-term plan or primarily a mix of incompetence, cowardice, and short-term economic and political dubious practices. When a patient suffers from a serious disease, you focus first on the urgent matter: how to cure him or minimize the long-term health damage. Analysing whether he got infected on purpose or not is at the moment not really the urgent matter IMHO.
Yes, you're right! I wasn't commenting on this article in particular though. It's an excellent list to counter the prefabricated arguments from the deniers. My comment was on where to put effort in general. The issue couldn't be more serious, and yes there is evidence that plans have existed already a long time ago, but I don't think it will ever be possible to prove that they're being implemented. It doesn't matter. The task is difficult enough to demand a focus on the solutions, which are extremely difficult but not impossible (the Reconquista was successful after almost 8 centuries of struggle).
The reason the Reconquista succeeded in Spain is the absence of large scale immigration from Arabs. Unlike most of northern Africa, where the local Muslim chiefs brought massive amounts of Arabs from the Middle East and gave them privileged status, to the point that the native Berbers became a minority in their countries by the 17th century. The failure of reconquering northern Africa before the 19th century is to be put to the presence and resistance of Arabs.
Spain was occupied by a series of Muslim states/kingdoms/caliphates that fought each other all the time. Some of them were Arab Muslim states while other were Berber Muslim states. In some centuries the Berber Muslims were the dominant invaders while in others the Arab Muslims were dominant. I can't imagine the indigenous Christian population cared at all or even knew if the invaders were Berbers or Arabs. Both were called "Moors". Just to point out that the invasion was Muslim, not Arab, and that a mix of foreign ethnicities can take over your native country the same way a homogenous group of invaders can.
Solid point that addressing the problem should be the focus.... But when you think about how to solve the problem, surely calling out the bad actors is part of the solution. You can't "solve" this without calling out the NGO's and Jewish funded groups promoting the problem and removing them from society
Societies face extinction when weak men predominate them.
"They" have been executing "their" long term plan to systematically weaken European descended males.
Because "they" know European descended males are the biggest threat to "their" power.
European descended males will not be able to strengthen as long as they remain beholden to "their" system.
"Their" wage, tax & debt slavery system.
There is no way to reclaim our nations & societies that does not involve a lot of pain, blood & suffering.
The longer the battle is delayed, the weaker European descended males become.
Thankfully "their" primary system of control- the western financial system- is very close to collapse.
When it collapses, so to does "their" wage, tax & debt slavery system.
When European descended males no longer have a job, they are no longer obliged to pay into tax & debt parts of their slave system.
Before I write the next part I want to say- I am a European descended male that was born and raised on a farm in western Canada.
I am now a sovereign male expat living outside the "west". I was living in Ukraine when the American/UK/EU proxy war against Russia broke out in 2022.
I have never been to Russia. But I will be visiting Russia and quite likely return to living in the city I was living in when the proxy war started, but it will be in Russia when I return.
I bring this up because Russophobia seems to be rampant in the UK and other European countries.
Russia is at war with "them", our oppressors. The ones that have systematically brainwashed and weakened us since "they" won WW2.
Now "they" are trying to start WW3 with Russia. And "they" expect you(not me) to go fight the evil Russians to protect "them".
WAKE THE FUCK UP.
Russia is European descended males best allie.
Russia is focused on ending "their" control of the world.
Thus- by extension ending "their" wage, tax & debt slave system- freeing you to finish the job of eliminating "them"
Important- who is "they/them"?
While many are fixated on the jews, it is important to understand european descended gentile traitors are even more to blame than the jews.
This means the British "Royal" family and every other European "royal" family, along with various old European family dynasties are your slavers.
Fixation on racism, migrants, politics, victimhood is a waste of time.
All of these things were created & controlled by "them".
Until you/we start focusing on the "root causes"- "them", nothing can change.
This series of essays seems like a book in the making. Reading it, I find myself thinking of Guillaume Faye's Why We Fight. This set of essays would make a great polemic of that kind, written to motivate, rather than an exhaustive study that might appear dull and depressing.
That's a good idea. The series totals just over 18,000 words. That would be an extremely small book. Maybe it would be publishable if some related essays were included - eg. "Britain and Class", "The Muslim Rape Gang Epidemic", "Starkey and Multiculturalism" and "Riots and Revelations". That would total over 31,000 words. There's also a huge essay I'm working on about a black activist which would add another 18,000 words, and I'm sure then it would be a publishable collection.
Although this might sound cynical, it would make a potential publisher smile: you have clocked up a lot of likes on these essays. And your The Woke Right essay has clocked up 241. Goodness knows how many people watch Millenniyule. And each featured person has their own following, or at least many of them do, which could be seen as your potential readership. What I'm saying is, it wouldn't be like publishing a pertinent book by someone who writes well but hasn't got a name in the wider world. I'm not saying do 'sales' stuff, just send someone like Woodlander a copy and he will make his own judgement on it. That hinterland is a base that will build itself up. You can just do what you do. This content is important and should be in a book. Print still has status, strange though it might seem. Like gold has always been money, a book has always had authority. Always. No matter how much nonsense is published, that remains the case. I say this because reading this stuff in a book will encourage people to have confidence in their own perceptions and opinions. That is why publishing has been as controlled as money printing, film, monarchs and the electoral system, etc. The internet has far wider reach, but it is seen as flakey and unreliable. If I tend too far with what I say to my dad he will reply, "what have you been reading on the internet?" A book is old money. And a book is felt to be much less fleeting than something digital. There are of course online archives but if they feature material disliked by those who prefer not to be questioned, then you need to download a special browser to see their contents in the search results. Books have a life of their own, each is an individual with its own path. Even when abandoned a book can find its way. Who knows who will pick up a book in a charity shop, nor what they will make of it. Books endure. Plus there are book repositories, etc. I used to be quite widely reviewed. My last book of poetry appeared after I was unpersoned and it got only one review by someone who stuck his neck out rather nervously. Hedging his position, he said "Andrew Jordan is well gone but his voice remains". What 'well gone' means, I don't really know. I think of the Cheshire Cat and its smile. But that book remains and it does its work in the way books do. It's time you thought about this further. I'd say, take your time. Don't lunge at it. Something enduring needs a bit of time to work the ideas through, but don't take too long.
That's my pleasure. And an aspect of that feeling is that you are British. We are an endangered species. It is good to interact with a good one.
Also, I must say this. It was from reading something you wrote that I remembered Survivors. When I say remembered, all I could remember was the opening sequence where the scientist drops the flask. I found the boxed set and we are watching it. One or two episodes per week. I am in a state of deep thoughtfulness about a number of aspects . . . but I will leave that for another time. Our most recent episode was The Witch.
What interested me in that episode is when Charles tells the woman that it's her own fault others haven't accepted her, because she doesn't mingle enough.
There are some strange mechanics to the story telling. I haven't watched beyond that point, but I think some of the character dissonance is a by-product of the requirements of the plot. Mind you, I have not made my mind up about Charles. His dark aspect, it seems a bit Manson Family. And Pet is quite hippy. That reinforced the impression of something dark hippy going on. I'm not so sure now though . . .
There is nothing wrong with producing a booklet, or short book. This issue is too important not to publish it. In addition people are reading less now (terrible but true) so something shorter is more likely to be read. What you are writing in this series is concise and extremely well thought out and presented. For goodness sake’s, I’ve even written a book, so you could and should publish this!
Self publishing has a very honourable history. It isn't the same as vanity publishing at all. I might well be self published when I have finished writing my next . . . The big problem for self published authors is finding an audience. You have a following, and a hinterland beyond, as already stated.
Also, in the meantime, Lulu.com can work for certain authors, certain books. David Rogers Webb's The Great Taking is published that way. He sells it for cost of production. I strongly recommend that book. DuckDuckGo.com finds it. The print version is ten quid. He gives the PDF away. It is a very, very important book and a lot of copies have been distributed.
"People will “believe” what they are paid to believe. People will not see that which they are paid not to see. "
Substitute the verb "forced" for "paid." Not so long ago the correct verb was "asked." Otherwise, pitch perfect.
The coordinated white erasure in all European-majority countries, save a rare few that are savagely targeted for not going along with their destruction, is absolute proof of a genocidal international conspiracy. The only question is whether those behind the genocide are governmental or extra-governmental. I tend toward the latter. It now seems apparent that public officials are simple figureheads, dutiful whores in the employ of a powerful group or groups that decided to eliminate the white race. We need to know the "who" answer immediately because we are the "whom."
At the time of writing, Los Angeles is devolving into civil war, non-whites/white collaborators vs. a nominally white-dominated government. Refreshingly, it is being combatted with justified violence and coordinated force. This is the future of the West, folks, and there is no way around it now. If current trends continue, we will lose the ability to resist our dispossession (it is close now). The responsible parties must be identified. The Help and Hos in elected office are a symptom, not the disease. Time grows short. Europeans need to look long and hard at what is unfolding in North America.
Wonderful series, Colin, but damn if this isn't horrible.
You are 100% correct and this needs saying more and more until people wake up and demand something be done to reverse this insanity . It is no good keep on pretending that immigrants are welcome here because the fact is they are not but a huge majority of English people .
I had allowed my subscription to lapse, but on the strength of this article I have (grudgingly, of course) renewed it. One of the most useful services content creators can provide is short articles that round up the arguments of our enemies in a point by point way, and show the purpose such arguments serve. Good job.
One quibble: The ludicrous propaganda is not the cause but a downstream effect of something else: The denial of equal rights for white people to express group interests like everyone else.
The persecution of whites who express group interests operates as an immunosuppressant, destroying our ability to resist the propaganda by destroying those who question it.
AIDS doesn't kill patients, it is the opportunistic diseases that take advantage of the compromised immune system that do so. But AIDS get the blame and rightly so.
Likewise the ludicrous propaganda isn't the root cause, it is what becomes enabled by the immunosuppression, which is the real culprit.
Having said that your list of logical contradictions is a brilliant defense manual for breaking leftist arguments. Defense is important.
But offense matters also. And asking why we can't have equal rights to express group interests like everyone else is what good offense looks like: An argument that cannot be parried and one that strikes the root.
The ludicrous contradictions require censorship and force to be effective. Colin's list is excellent and shocking in that the transparently false claims worked to a point.
Thank you for providing yet another succinctly well researched, reasoned and presented analytical essay.
It is now clear and obvious, and has been for sometime, that there is intent and collusion between all the institutions of state and society along with foreing actors to bring about the demise of the Caucasian race in it's entirety, no matter where Caucasians live or how small our numbers. This is an active agenda that has been implemented and perpetuated for many decadess now. We the Caucasian race in all our diverse iterations have been marked for eradication and all the institutions of state and society are working towards this end.
This has seemingly come about for ideological reasons decided in the early 20th century, or at least the active implementation of such an agenda, even if it existed beforehand, but was unable to be implemented.
It has been deemed by the parasitic elites and their useful idiots that we are unworthy and undeserving of life and existence. Therefore everything has been and is being done to emisserate and eliminate us as a race and our varied ethnicities, upto and including the denigration and eradication of our cultures and civilisation. There is a clear and active intent to denigrate and destroy everything concerning us up to and including but not limited to our traditions, taboos and beliefs, even our various forms of art and entertainment has been wilfully and deliberately targeted. The intent is to utterly erase us from the world and history if possible.
Echoes some of what I say in the essay below. Essentially - it's too late. 2TK won't leave until 2029. By then we're at the Schwarschild Radius and a quasi- islamic state. Unless of course normies somehow lose their sky sports and then it will really 'kick off'.
https://open.substack.com/pub/futuredad/p/futuredad-33-how-and-why-the-uk-will?r=59rk8t&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&showWelcomeOnShare=true
Woes, you are the most lucid writer (and orator) on the dissident right - autistically analytical but with a decidedly unautistic turn of phrase. No wonder Greg Johnson was trying to poach you.
Thank you.
Yeah so this guy called Adolf Hitler was talking about this stuff 100 years ago. A certain group of nepotistic people enjoys forcing other peoples to mix and compete with one another in order to generate behavioural cultural and genetic confusion so their nepotistic power can't be threatened by a cohesive and organised ethnic group with uniform ethical intellectual and behavioural traits
Correct. Except same guy made his own to decision to start a war with other powerful countries at the time (France, Britain, USA, Russia), themselves mostly white and monoracial, that didn't want to be invaded by him.
Morale of the story: nobody really wants anybody else to force anything on them.
He didn't start a war with them nor did he ever aggress against them lol. They declared war on him after Jewish financiers bought out their national leaders' political debt. Remember the entire excuse for World War 2 was the "liberation of Poland", a country the UK and France just gave away to the Soviet Union at the end of the war. WW2 started for the same reason we are being dragged into attacking Iran, Jewish ethnic networks in Western governments.
My one niggardly criticism would be that the 'Great' should be bracketed. If you're going to stick with the term, that has no doubt been manipulated along the way, there's nothing of greatness about it and would be better named 'Foul' or similar.
Words are magic some do argue.
'Great' in this context means large scale, e.g. great wall of China.
Neither of you are comprehending the power and use of words.
"Spelling".
Or "the Great Plague of London".
The Great Replacement as a deliberate plan is the only logical conclusion, and though one could distinguish governmental misfeasance from malfeasance, ultimately they are just two means to the same malicious end.
It's happening in my country, Croatia, as well and I hear the same lies and garbage.
Different set of circumstances here though and I wont bore you with them.
I never cared whether the GR was the consequence of a very sophisticated, very concrete long-term plan or primarily a mix of incompetence, cowardice, and short-term economic and political dubious practices. When a patient suffers from a serious disease, you focus first on the urgent matter: how to cure him or minimize the long-term health damage. Analysing whether he got infected on purpose or not is at the moment not really the urgent matter IMHO.
Well it does matter because it means the person who infected him is still at large and will strike again and again until you deal with them
I take the point, but this essay is one in a series of nine, and I think the topic is important enough to warrant that.
Yes, as I wrote before, my comment didn't refer to this article.
Not really the point of the article but more how to counter the various sophisms when engaging with those who deny that it's happening.
Yes, you're right! I wasn't commenting on this article in particular though. It's an excellent list to counter the prefabricated arguments from the deniers. My comment was on where to put effort in general. The issue couldn't be more serious, and yes there is evidence that plans have existed already a long time ago, but I don't think it will ever be possible to prove that they're being implemented. It doesn't matter. The task is difficult enough to demand a focus on the solutions, which are extremely difficult but not impossible (the Reconquista was successful after almost 8 centuries of struggle).
The reason the Reconquista succeeded in Spain is the absence of large scale immigration from Arabs. Unlike most of northern Africa, where the local Muslim chiefs brought massive amounts of Arabs from the Middle East and gave them privileged status, to the point that the native Berbers became a minority in their countries by the 17th century. The failure of reconquering northern Africa before the 19th century is to be put to the presence and resistance of Arabs.
Spain was occupied by a series of Muslim states/kingdoms/caliphates that fought each other all the time. Some of them were Arab Muslim states while other were Berber Muslim states. In some centuries the Berber Muslims were the dominant invaders while in others the Arab Muslims were dominant. I can't imagine the indigenous Christian population cared at all or even knew if the invaders were Berbers or Arabs. Both were called "Moors". Just to point out that the invasion was Muslim, not Arab, and that a mix of foreign ethnicities can take over your native country the same way a homogenous group of invaders can.
Solid point that addressing the problem should be the focus.... But when you think about how to solve the problem, surely calling out the bad actors is part of the solution. You can't "solve" this without calling out the NGO's and Jewish funded groups promoting the problem and removing them from society
Societies face extinction when weak men predominate them.
"They" have been executing "their" long term plan to systematically weaken European descended males.
Because "they" know European descended males are the biggest threat to "their" power.
European descended males will not be able to strengthen as long as they remain beholden to "their" system.
"Their" wage, tax & debt slavery system.
There is no way to reclaim our nations & societies that does not involve a lot of pain, blood & suffering.
The longer the battle is delayed, the weaker European descended males become.
Thankfully "their" primary system of control- the western financial system- is very close to collapse.
When it collapses, so to does "their" wage, tax & debt slavery system.
When European descended males no longer have a job, they are no longer obliged to pay into tax & debt parts of their slave system.
Before I write the next part I want to say- I am a European descended male that was born and raised on a farm in western Canada.
I am now a sovereign male expat living outside the "west". I was living in Ukraine when the American/UK/EU proxy war against Russia broke out in 2022.
I have never been to Russia. But I will be visiting Russia and quite likely return to living in the city I was living in when the proxy war started, but it will be in Russia when I return.
I bring this up because Russophobia seems to be rampant in the UK and other European countries.
Russia is at war with "them", our oppressors. The ones that have systematically brainwashed and weakened us since "they" won WW2.
Now "they" are trying to start WW3 with Russia. And "they" expect you(not me) to go fight the evil Russians to protect "them".
WAKE THE FUCK UP.
Russia is European descended males best allie.
Russia is focused on ending "their" control of the world.
Thus- by extension ending "their" wage, tax & debt slave system- freeing you to finish the job of eliminating "them"
Important- who is "they/them"?
While many are fixated on the jews, it is important to understand european descended gentile traitors are even more to blame than the jews.
This means the British "Royal" family and every other European "royal" family, along with various old European family dynasties are your slavers.
Fixation on racism, migrants, politics, victimhood is a waste of time.
All of these things were created & controlled by "them".
Until you/we start focusing on the "root causes"- "them", nothing can change.
Oh, and whilst I think of it, here is a short clip I found on YouTube 😂. I suppose one has to just laugh at it, otherwise cry:
https://youtu.be/qJfgb_ssww0?feature=shared
This series of essays seems like a book in the making. Reading it, I find myself thinking of Guillaume Faye's Why We Fight. This set of essays would make a great polemic of that kind, written to motivate, rather than an exhaustive study that might appear dull and depressing.
That's a good idea. The series totals just over 18,000 words. That would be an extremely small book. Maybe it would be publishable if some related essays were included - eg. "Britain and Class", "The Muslim Rape Gang Epidemic", "Starkey and Multiculturalism" and "Riots and Revelations". That would total over 31,000 words. There's also a huge essay I'm working on about a black activist which would add another 18,000 words, and I'm sure then it would be a publishable collection.
Although this might sound cynical, it would make a potential publisher smile: you have clocked up a lot of likes on these essays. And your The Woke Right essay has clocked up 241. Goodness knows how many people watch Millenniyule. And each featured person has their own following, or at least many of them do, which could be seen as your potential readership. What I'm saying is, it wouldn't be like publishing a pertinent book by someone who writes well but hasn't got a name in the wider world. I'm not saying do 'sales' stuff, just send someone like Woodlander a copy and he will make his own judgement on it. That hinterland is a base that will build itself up. You can just do what you do. This content is important and should be in a book. Print still has status, strange though it might seem. Like gold has always been money, a book has always had authority. Always. No matter how much nonsense is published, that remains the case. I say this because reading this stuff in a book will encourage people to have confidence in their own perceptions and opinions. That is why publishing has been as controlled as money printing, film, monarchs and the electoral system, etc. The internet has far wider reach, but it is seen as flakey and unreliable. If I tend too far with what I say to my dad he will reply, "what have you been reading on the internet?" A book is old money. And a book is felt to be much less fleeting than something digital. There are of course online archives but if they feature material disliked by those who prefer not to be questioned, then you need to download a special browser to see their contents in the search results. Books have a life of their own, each is an individual with its own path. Even when abandoned a book can find its way. Who knows who will pick up a book in a charity shop, nor what they will make of it. Books endure. Plus there are book repositories, etc. I used to be quite widely reviewed. My last book of poetry appeared after I was unpersoned and it got only one review by someone who stuck his neck out rather nervously. Hedging his position, he said "Andrew Jordan is well gone but his voice remains". What 'well gone' means, I don't really know. I think of the Cheshire Cat and its smile. But that book remains and it does its work in the way books do. It's time you thought about this further. I'd say, take your time. Don't lunge at it. Something enduring needs a bit of time to work the ideas through, but don't take too long.
Thank you, Andrew.
That's my pleasure. And an aspect of that feeling is that you are British. We are an endangered species. It is good to interact with a good one.
Also, I must say this. It was from reading something you wrote that I remembered Survivors. When I say remembered, all I could remember was the opening sequence where the scientist drops the flask. I found the boxed set and we are watching it. One or two episodes per week. I am in a state of deep thoughtfulness about a number of aspects . . . but I will leave that for another time. Our most recent episode was The Witch.
What interested me in that episode is when Charles tells the woman that it's her own fault others haven't accepted her, because she doesn't mingle enough.
There are some strange mechanics to the story telling. I haven't watched beyond that point, but I think some of the character dissonance is a by-product of the requirements of the plot. Mind you, I have not made my mind up about Charles. His dark aspect, it seems a bit Manson Family. And Pet is quite hippy. That reinforced the impression of something dark hippy going on. I'm not so sure now though . . .
There is nothing wrong with producing a booklet, or short book. This issue is too important not to publish it. In addition people are reading less now (terrible but true) so something shorter is more likely to be read. What you are writing in this series is concise and extremely well thought out and presented. For goodness sake’s, I’ve even written a book, so you could and should publish this!
Yes, I'd rather publish this series on its own, for the reasons you cite. I'm just not sure whether publishers would go for it.
Self publishing has a very honourable history. It isn't the same as vanity publishing at all. I might well be self published when I have finished writing my next . . . The big problem for self published authors is finding an audience. You have a following, and a hinterland beyond, as already stated.
Also, in the meantime, Lulu.com can work for certain authors, certain books. David Rogers Webb's The Great Taking is published that way. He sells it for cost of production. I strongly recommend that book. DuckDuckGo.com finds it. The print version is ten quid. He gives the PDF away. It is a very, very important book and a lot of copies have been distributed.
https://thegreattaking.com/read-online-or-download
I would once have said, 'try Arktos', but they smell a bit too much of Dugin these days.
Aren't you the one who came up with this definition: "Racism is where White people act like non-Whites"? (or something similar with better grammar)
I don't think so...
"People will “believe” what they are paid to believe. People will not see that which they are paid not to see. "
Substitute the verb "forced" for "paid." Not so long ago the correct verb was "asked." Otherwise, pitch perfect.
The coordinated white erasure in all European-majority countries, save a rare few that are savagely targeted for not going along with their destruction, is absolute proof of a genocidal international conspiracy. The only question is whether those behind the genocide are governmental or extra-governmental. I tend toward the latter. It now seems apparent that public officials are simple figureheads, dutiful whores in the employ of a powerful group or groups that decided to eliminate the white race. We need to know the "who" answer immediately because we are the "whom."
At the time of writing, Los Angeles is devolving into civil war, non-whites/white collaborators vs. a nominally white-dominated government. Refreshingly, it is being combatted with justified violence and coordinated force. This is the future of the West, folks, and there is no way around it now. If current trends continue, we will lose the ability to resist our dispossession (it is close now). The responsible parties must be identified. The Help and Hos in elected office are a symptom, not the disease. Time grows short. Europeans need to look long and hard at what is unfolding in North America.
Wonderful series, Colin, but damn if this isn't horrible.
You are 100% correct and this needs saying more and more until people wake up and demand something be done to reverse this insanity . It is no good keep on pretending that immigrants are welcome here because the fact is they are not but a huge majority of English people .
I had allowed my subscription to lapse, but on the strength of this article I have (grudgingly, of course) renewed it. One of the most useful services content creators can provide is short articles that round up the arguments of our enemies in a point by point way, and show the purpose such arguments serve. Good job.
Thank you.
One quibble: The ludicrous propaganda is not the cause but a downstream effect of something else: The denial of equal rights for white people to express group interests like everyone else.
The persecution of whites who express group interests operates as an immunosuppressant, destroying our ability to resist the propaganda by destroying those who question it.
AIDS doesn't kill patients, it is the opportunistic diseases that take advantage of the compromised immune system that do so. But AIDS get the blame and rightly so.
Likewise the ludicrous propaganda isn't the root cause, it is what becomes enabled by the immunosuppression, which is the real culprit.
Having said that your list of logical contradictions is a brilliant defense manual for breaking leftist arguments. Defense is important.
But offense matters also. And asking why we can't have equal rights to express group interests like everyone else is what good offense looks like: An argument that cannot be parried and one that strikes the root.
The ludicrous contradictions require censorship and force to be effective. Colin's list is excellent and shocking in that the transparently false claims worked to a point.