I just came from spending Sunday at a funfair in London with the kids and it was brutally depressing. There were close to zero English kids, the very few English kids were thoroughly integrated into black ghetto antics and culture, the few white kids were recent Eastern Europeans or holdouts from when the UK was in the EU. But that was not all because not only was the park not white, it was uncivilised, ugly, smelly, and alarmingly third world. Of all the possible “non white” mixes, I could not think of any other worse mix. Then I saw a little garden in the park and I went in and because it was pretty, only white people went in but what type of white people? Single feminists, homosexual men and one couple with one kid. I’m not joking this was the composition.
I only have disgust, contempt, and hate left. Zero hope.
A great start to a needed series - thank you! Easier said than done to follow through in writing this sort of thing. Well done.
It is THE question of our time, and I suspect it has been the question for many other times and places for thousands of years - hence the obsession with the phallus in White art, for one explanation. The general pattern seems to be, Whites create a lovely civilization, others creep in, then pour in, Whites leave, are killed, or their genes are blended out within a generation or two.
The hilariously ironic part of all this is how Whites are convinced they are the devil, when they are far too altruistic, which is how this problem begins. We have an inherent need to beautify, explore, discover, improve upon - and as Nietzsche said of woman being the best play thing for man - who desires danger - so, too, are the masses of the world a bit of a project in a need to "civilize." No more White Man's Burden. I'm really fucking tired of it. Aren't we all? We need land - ONE - where it's law.
Woes, this is probably the best, and most important piece of writing I have yet seen from you. Concise and clear introduction to what you are going to expand upon.
I have a question to ask. I created infographics that are sometimes quotes from people. With your permission I would like to make one of these of the following quote from the above article:
“ Human diversity should be preserved for its own sake, for the same reasons that we desire to preserve plant and animal species. We might find some more attractive or admirable than others, but regardless we want to preserve all of them (barring extreme outliers like the pitbull terrier). It is incoherent that we put such store into that task of preservation while claiming that human sub-sets are not worth preserving at all - especially when we simultaneously claim that “diversity” is wonderful.
All of this being the case, of course we should fight to preserve the unique cultures of White countries, and the ethnic groups that embody and produce them.”
Also, and I should have pointed this out, don’t be put off by my instagram having only one follower, I had my old page there shut down and only started a new one a few days ago.
Okay, just created it. I used an image of a little White girl and a beautiful bit of European architecture behind. People tend to be protective of children, especially girls. Below is a link to the infographic on Instagram (where I have just uploaded it). Everyone is welcome to use it. I can create others too for slogans, quotes etc.
Great article! If any of the future posts get more specific into Canada/US/New Zealand feel free to reference my "under age 35" article or my x posts from May 10, Apr 27, Feb 15. No credit needed.
I also did Sweden under age 50 on Feb 17 and UK births on Feb 11.
First they told us they're few, just a drop in the ocean.
And we trusted them. They were indeed few.
Then they became many. And they told us it doesn't matter because according to the Great Prophecy of Integration they'll become Englishmen no different from you, except color.
And we trusted them. Sure they're crazy as shit religious loons but maybe they're right and it'll work out. And in any case we didn't want to get persecuted for heresy.
Then they told us that we need a police state to crush dissent. That it was regrettable but there was no choice. Unless we sacrifice our nation, culture and country the evil god hitler will arise and blot out the sun! Oh no! And there's these ignorants who don't believe our primitive religion, whose disbelief is enabling the evil god! We must sacrifice them first! Sorry but there's no choice.
And we trusted them. Sure they're completely zonked out of their minds. They're high as kites on their primitive pseudo-Aztec religion, that is moreover a human sacrifice religion, which is usually not a good sign. But they sounded genuinely concerned about this hitler god of theirs. They may be misguided, even stupid, certainly primitive, but they were still fundamentally good hearted.
And then things changed. Trump happened. The king of trolls grabbed a cat, sneaked up on them and threw it in the henhouse. He let in 56 refugees from South Africa. Boom! The left exploded with rage, screaming that the Afrikaners cannot be allowed to escape accountability for historic injustice.
And the mask fell right off.
One moment they were religious freakazoids who were nevertheless operating in good faith, though in their own weird way. They had a safety blanket of plausible stupidity.
And the next moment they stood there exposed. And we all saw it. We saw a coalition of whites and nons united by hatred, seething with murderous resentment. The white side of the coalition wanted revenge against English society for marginalizing them, as fags, as cat ladies, as drug addicts and as losers in general. The nons likewise wanted payback against the English for humiliating them, for contrasting their mud huts with high civilization, for exposing them as butthurt losers of history.
And so the trust evaporated, for the mask has fallen, the deception has ended and the reality of irreconcileable hatred has finally welled forth.
And here we are. Now we see each other clearly, as enemies, and nothing but enemies.
It's absolutely a religion - it has all the ingredients. Authorities, legitimacy, theology, and... ritual. I've been mentoring a young essay writer on this aspect of so-called "hate speech" policies for a contest. One is burned at the stake these days if one is racially aware. Even, according to the Irish Times, if they "seem coherent, present logical arguments, and have reasonable concerns," the Irish Times tells us, "They are racists."
Very well written comment. I don't know that I agree about the Trump angle, honestly. There just seems to be no way that Trump isn't a puppet, that he doesn't have marching orders, and while he may believe he's autonomous, he cannot be. Ergo, why's he "allowed" to do some things that make it appear there's opposition?
Britain should offer asylum to its diaspora in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. This can offset the supposed economic impact of remigrating the brown "labour" force out of Britain.
Also, the decolonisation of Australia, New Zealand and SA is morally consistent with the idea of whites having a homeland in Britain.
This is probably the only way to get white leftists onside with remigrating browns and blacks out of UK/Europe.
Without white leftists getting on board, I can't see large-scale remigration succeeding.
Great stuff as always, looking forward to the rest of the series.
Ofc we know perfectly well why the UN definition doesn't apply to Whites, and never will, despite it formally and logically applying: it was invented with the thought of mainly one particular ethnic group foremost in mind, and it will be applied to other ethnic groups only so long as doing so helps that particular ethnic group's cause. Applying the principles even-handedly to Whites would totally defeat that purpose.
This is a wonderful introduction to a needed series, Colin. Spectacular per usual.
Relatedly:
It is hard to ascertain the rationale behind it, if there even is one, but the Trump Administration trolling South Africa over white genocide has been instructive. Leftists* either outright deny the targeted killings or in rare cases excuse or support the murders. Even if this is a mere rhetorical exercise, the responses sometimes are shocking to people outside of our sphere. I'm not sold on the notion Normie ever will "wake up" short of starvation or other forms of deprivation or violence, but since those almost certainly are coming his way, perhaps he can be primed for that eventuality. Anecdotally, I read an X posting from a Normie Conservative whale account during the South Africa dust-up to the effect that "+75 percent of the world population is eyeing suburban houses in the United States and preparing to take them." I don't recall this speculation outside of our sphere previously. Can those asleep still be primed? Let's hope. Posts like that one suggests it.
As a thought exercise, think of the even louder outcry that would have happened if Trump had outright threatened Ramaphosa with a military response if the genocide continues, or if white men volunteered to go to South Africa to help the Boers fight similar to what happened initially with the Ukraine. People, and this even includes us at times, are so inured now to the relentless assault on whites that we either ignore or have internalized and accepted the rules, if you will, that have been formulated to facilitate our genocide.
And as an aside, I think part of the mad rush to censor social media and other information outlets was to keep white Europeans ignorant of what is being done to their brothers and sisters in other countries. Would there be widespread knowledge of, say, what is happening in Ireland if the censorship had been successful? That is doubtful, and why efforts will continue to silence us.
*As a convenience; there are obvious commonalities with the Left.
What is happening is full scale White Erasure, which is a more useful and accurate descriptor. It encompasses everything leading up and including genocide. It is the descruction of our norms, standards, values, culture and ultimately us as a people. White Erasure is happening here in our own countries, every day, and in South Africa. The reason is that societies operate on a social morality. The social morality today is antiwhitism. It is why our people will be disenfranchised and victimized and then claim that it had nothing to do with race. They don't want to be seen as opposing what is clearly the social morality of our time. We are completely justified in opposing our own erasure and we need to see ourselves as a people. It is antiwhite to assume that we alone, must atone for actions in the past that we did not commit, and we are the only ones expected to do so. We must reject this premise. I do not accept the justification that we must be victimized today for things in the past, that all peoples the world over have engaged in. To suggest otherwise is just antiwhite.
Yes, exactly, all of that. So-called "affirmative action" was an early instance of forcing us to accept blame for things that did not involve us. "White privilege" claims are a modified version to make responsibility irrelevant. Erasure is the end game.
Regarding the rationale- The South African govt has taken Israel to the International Court of Justice over their genocide in Gaza. This is the reason for the token 50-odd Boers getting a pass.
Not to blackpill. It's still a W. Lives were probably saved. But it's just ZOG theater. One of Israel's very few critics gets humiliated in front of the world. Throw the American white boys a bone before priming them up to die in Iran. It was the smart move from the enemy.
That is in fact what I initially thought and it actually may be the rationale. I just don't know. Regardless of the motive, though, the reactions have been instructive for those outside of our sphere. A few will begin their movement this way.
As an aside, South Africa pointing out Israel's ongoing ethnic cleansing campaign is just as rich as it is true.
Well said. Though as for reasons why, obviously ideological on a surface level. But go deeper down the rabbit hole and see where that leads and the conclusions that might be derived from doing so...
I just came from spending Sunday at a funfair in London with the kids and it was brutally depressing. There were close to zero English kids, the very few English kids were thoroughly integrated into black ghetto antics and culture, the few white kids were recent Eastern Europeans or holdouts from when the UK was in the EU. But that was not all because not only was the park not white, it was uncivilised, ugly, smelly, and alarmingly third world. Of all the possible “non white” mixes, I could not think of any other worse mix. Then I saw a little garden in the park and I went in and because it was pretty, only white people went in but what type of white people? Single feminists, homosexual men and one couple with one kid. I’m not joking this was the composition.
I only have disgust, contempt, and hate left. Zero hope.
Wonderfully lucid argument 👍
A great start to a needed series - thank you! Easier said than done to follow through in writing this sort of thing. Well done.
It is THE question of our time, and I suspect it has been the question for many other times and places for thousands of years - hence the obsession with the phallus in White art, for one explanation. The general pattern seems to be, Whites create a lovely civilization, others creep in, then pour in, Whites leave, are killed, or their genes are blended out within a generation or two.
The hilariously ironic part of all this is how Whites are convinced they are the devil, when they are far too altruistic, which is how this problem begins. We have an inherent need to beautify, explore, discover, improve upon - and as Nietzsche said of woman being the best play thing for man - who desires danger - so, too, are the masses of the world a bit of a project in a need to "civilize." No more White Man's Burden. I'm really fucking tired of it. Aren't we all? We need land - ONE - where it's law.
"Human diversity should be preserved for its own sake, for the same reasons that we desire to preserve plant and animal species."
We don't need a museum of humanity. That is precisely where the problem started.
I tend to agree to a point. If life is worthy of itself, it'll save itself and exist. If not, it won't.
"Thou hast become a meal for ravens,
Ere thou didst reach the front of conflict."
A dangerous image of the nation, but helpful if one can escape today's reasons of state.
An excellent exposition that covers the various fatuous objections from the self-declared custodians of virtue.
Woes, this is probably the best, and most important piece of writing I have yet seen from you. Concise and clear introduction to what you are going to expand upon.
I have a question to ask. I created infographics that are sometimes quotes from people. With your permission I would like to make one of these of the following quote from the above article:
“ Human diversity should be preserved for its own sake, for the same reasons that we desire to preserve plant and animal species. We might find some more attractive or admirable than others, but regardless we want to preserve all of them (barring extreme outliers like the pitbull terrier). It is incoherent that we put such store into that task of preservation while claiming that human sub-sets are not worth preserving at all - especially when we simultaneously claim that “diversity” is wonderful.
All of this being the case, of course we should fight to preserve the unique cultures of White countries, and the ethnic groups that embody and produce them.”
from the article The Great Replacement as a Crime
by Millennial Woes 25th of May 2025
Yes, please go ahead.
Also, and I should have pointed this out, don’t be put off by my instagram having only one follower, I had my old page there shut down and only started a new one a few days ago.
Okay, just created it. I used an image of a little White girl and a beautiful bit of European architecture behind. People tend to be protective of children, especially girls. Below is a link to the infographic on Instagram (where I have just uploaded it). Everyone is welcome to use it. I can create others too for slogans, quotes etc.
https://www.instagram.com/p/DKJicV2PWbR/?igsh=MXNrczQ0cHA5OGZmMw==
Thanks, I will get onto it. I will use a nice image of White Europeans to go with the quote.
I'll be sharing this series with friends. (normies, and those who are almost there).
Great article! If any of the future posts get more specific into Canada/US/New Zealand feel free to reference my "under age 35" article or my x posts from May 10, Apr 27, Feb 15. No credit needed.
I also did Sweden under age 50 on Feb 17 and UK births on Feb 11.
First they told us they're few, just a drop in the ocean.
And we trusted them. They were indeed few.
Then they became many. And they told us it doesn't matter because according to the Great Prophecy of Integration they'll become Englishmen no different from you, except color.
And we trusted them. Sure they're crazy as shit religious loons but maybe they're right and it'll work out. And in any case we didn't want to get persecuted for heresy.
Then they told us that we need a police state to crush dissent. That it was regrettable but there was no choice. Unless we sacrifice our nation, culture and country the evil god hitler will arise and blot out the sun! Oh no! And there's these ignorants who don't believe our primitive religion, whose disbelief is enabling the evil god! We must sacrifice them first! Sorry but there's no choice.
And we trusted them. Sure they're completely zonked out of their minds. They're high as kites on their primitive pseudo-Aztec religion, that is moreover a human sacrifice religion, which is usually not a good sign. But they sounded genuinely concerned about this hitler god of theirs. They may be misguided, even stupid, certainly primitive, but they were still fundamentally good hearted.
And then things changed. Trump happened. The king of trolls grabbed a cat, sneaked up on them and threw it in the henhouse. He let in 56 refugees from South Africa. Boom! The left exploded with rage, screaming that the Afrikaners cannot be allowed to escape accountability for historic injustice.
And the mask fell right off.
One moment they were religious freakazoids who were nevertheless operating in good faith, though in their own weird way. They had a safety blanket of plausible stupidity.
And the next moment they stood there exposed. And we all saw it. We saw a coalition of whites and nons united by hatred, seething with murderous resentment. The white side of the coalition wanted revenge against English society for marginalizing them, as fags, as cat ladies, as drug addicts and as losers in general. The nons likewise wanted payback against the English for humiliating them, for contrasting their mud huts with high civilization, for exposing them as butthurt losers of history.
And so the trust evaporated, for the mask has fallen, the deception has ended and the reality of irreconcileable hatred has finally welled forth.
And here we are. Now we see each other clearly, as enemies, and nothing but enemies.
It's absolutely a religion - it has all the ingredients. Authorities, legitimacy, theology, and... ritual. I've been mentoring a young essay writer on this aspect of so-called "hate speech" policies for a contest. One is burned at the stake these days if one is racially aware. Even, according to the Irish Times, if they "seem coherent, present logical arguments, and have reasonable concerns," the Irish Times tells us, "They are racists."
Very well written comment. I don't know that I agree about the Trump angle, honestly. There just seems to be no way that Trump isn't a puppet, that he doesn't have marching orders, and while he may believe he's autonomous, he cannot be. Ergo, why's he "allowed" to do some things that make it appear there's opposition?
Britain should offer asylum to its diaspora in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa. This can offset the supposed economic impact of remigrating the brown "labour" force out of Britain.
Also, the decolonisation of Australia, New Zealand and SA is morally consistent with the idea of whites having a homeland in Britain.
This is probably the only way to get white leftists onside with remigrating browns and blacks out of UK/Europe.
Without white leftists getting on board, I can't see large-scale remigration succeeding.
We are all Norwedens, now. Insightful analysis as usual Woes. Cheers!
We don't need a museum of humanity. That is precisely where the problem started.
We don't need a museum of humanity. That is precisely where the problem started.
Please, continue.
Looking forward to it. Critically needed.
Great stuff as always, looking forward to the rest of the series.
Ofc we know perfectly well why the UN definition doesn't apply to Whites, and never will, despite it formally and logically applying: it was invented with the thought of mainly one particular ethnic group foremost in mind, and it will be applied to other ethnic groups only so long as doing so helps that particular ethnic group's cause. Applying the principles even-handedly to Whites would totally defeat that purpose.
All it would take to change the UN definition would be a handful of European leaders with some balls.
This is a wonderful introduction to a needed series, Colin. Spectacular per usual.
Relatedly:
It is hard to ascertain the rationale behind it, if there even is one, but the Trump Administration trolling South Africa over white genocide has been instructive. Leftists* either outright deny the targeted killings or in rare cases excuse or support the murders. Even if this is a mere rhetorical exercise, the responses sometimes are shocking to people outside of our sphere. I'm not sold on the notion Normie ever will "wake up" short of starvation or other forms of deprivation or violence, but since those almost certainly are coming his way, perhaps he can be primed for that eventuality. Anecdotally, I read an X posting from a Normie Conservative whale account during the South Africa dust-up to the effect that "+75 percent of the world population is eyeing suburban houses in the United States and preparing to take them." I don't recall this speculation outside of our sphere previously. Can those asleep still be primed? Let's hope. Posts like that one suggests it.
As a thought exercise, think of the even louder outcry that would have happened if Trump had outright threatened Ramaphosa with a military response if the genocide continues, or if white men volunteered to go to South Africa to help the Boers fight similar to what happened initially with the Ukraine. People, and this even includes us at times, are so inured now to the relentless assault on whites that we either ignore or have internalized and accepted the rules, if you will, that have been formulated to facilitate our genocide.
And as an aside, I think part of the mad rush to censor social media and other information outlets was to keep white Europeans ignorant of what is being done to their brothers and sisters in other countries. Would there be widespread knowledge of, say, what is happening in Ireland if the censorship had been successful? That is doubtful, and why efforts will continue to silence us.
*As a convenience; there are obvious commonalities with the Left.
What is happening is full scale White Erasure, which is a more useful and accurate descriptor. It encompasses everything leading up and including genocide. It is the descruction of our norms, standards, values, culture and ultimately us as a people. White Erasure is happening here in our own countries, every day, and in South Africa. The reason is that societies operate on a social morality. The social morality today is antiwhitism. It is why our people will be disenfranchised and victimized and then claim that it had nothing to do with race. They don't want to be seen as opposing what is clearly the social morality of our time. We are completely justified in opposing our own erasure and we need to see ourselves as a people. It is antiwhite to assume that we alone, must atone for actions in the past that we did not commit, and we are the only ones expected to do so. We must reject this premise. I do not accept the justification that we must be victimized today for things in the past, that all peoples the world over have engaged in. To suggest otherwise is just antiwhite.
"We must reject this premise"
Yes, exactly, all of that. So-called "affirmative action" was an early instance of forcing us to accept blame for things that did not involve us. "White privilege" claims are a modified version to make responsibility irrelevant. Erasure is the end game.
Regarding the rationale- The South African govt has taken Israel to the International Court of Justice over their genocide in Gaza. This is the reason for the token 50-odd Boers getting a pass.
Not to blackpill. It's still a W. Lives were probably saved. But it's just ZOG theater. One of Israel's very few critics gets humiliated in front of the world. Throw the American white boys a bone before priming them up to die in Iran. It was the smart move from the enemy.
That is in fact what I initially thought and it actually may be the rationale. I just don't know. Regardless of the motive, though, the reactions have been instructive for those outside of our sphere. A few will begin their movement this way.
As an aside, South Africa pointing out Israel's ongoing ethnic cleansing campaign is just as rich as it is true.
Well said. Though as for reasons why, obviously ideological on a surface level. But go deeper down the rabbit hole and see where that leads and the conclusions that might be derived from doing so...