There is a woke right. They're the people who took the cancel culture bullshit of the left and just changed the groups involved from blacks to Israelis. They are woke in favor of Israel and use all the exact same methods as the DEI crowd.
It really is just a trick: power to Jews and annihilation to whites. They continue it by simply avoiding speaking to anyone who'll ask challenging questions. They find the trick worthwhile as it captures dimwits and wastes the time and energy of better people.
>goes after people’s family members (struggle sessions)
I'll try to explain this one.
I've witnessed people, myself included, use the obstructions put up by DEI practices as absolute reasons why they cannot pursue employment or hobbies, for fear they will be prevented from doing so anyway, putting an end to their endeavours before they've started. This frustration exhibits itself as explaining to family, mainly parents or extended relatives, why they've not done anything when the matter is raised. The family members may not understand the reasons given, suggesting it was easy for them, detached from the reality what they were able to do was more accessible during their own youth, comparing the world they grew up in with the world now as the same somewhat. This is a self-perpetuating cycle, ergo 'struggle sessions', that never finds a resolution but is in search of other reasons why one cannot be found.
Well done, @millenial woes, capturing the essence of our side (Dissident Right) and the absurdity of the the "woke right" accusation. I've been looking for something like this to share with my friends and family.
The liberal sceptic uses a-priori reasoning when it comes to race. To them empirical evidence of achievement is unneccesary because they believe there are no fundamental difference between the races. Left-wing academic propaganda has caused so much damage.
James Lindsay is woke light - he accepts all of the premises of equality just not the speed at which woke race communism is moving.
It is important to recall that the term woke did not start as slander, rather the woke themselves referred to themselves as woke - for noticing the racial disparities which if it is assumed that all races are equal could only be attributed to racism. The woke believed being woke is good.
There already is a term that our movement is using. It is called based, as in based in reality. Why can't Lindsay refer to us using our own term as he does with woke? Perhaps because he knows being based is good.
The energy source for" woke" politics is the US civil rights legislation of the 1960s specifically designed to elevate blacks over whites. In the decades following other minorities have successfully claimed victimhood status too including white women who have been the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action. So any attempt to forge a collective white identity is fatally compromised from the start.
pfff honestly using woke left, woke right reminds me of right, left
this is political stuff polarization
the left turned nuts and stopped becoming representative of the real left ideas
they created a nomenclature for it, "woke" - which is actually something restricted to the left, for now. Psychopathology
and so, as of now there are no grounds for nomenclaturing "woke right". We don't need so and should refrain. We should once we see 90% of rightists turning nuts
it's not for nothing that they targeted the left
that's because they were fertile grounds for parasiting
I'd like to see your opinion on Jews as a whole expounded upon. I've seen many Dissident Rightists (something which I do still call myself, to some extent) who very much do conform to the allegations of rabid and reasonless antisemitism. I'd like to see them pushed back against from a perspective that they would still find reasonable.
People like Lindsay are writing essay after essay to try and make this stick, when in reality they are with Con Inc and asking right wingers who want actual change to just be Mitt Romney instead.
Whew! I read most of it! I’ve decided the best course is to pray for the Asteroid of Redemption to arrive quickly! Becoming primordial dust feels ennobling!
"It was anomalous for the US to inter Japanese people on the basis of their race during World War II, but it was done anyway because the situation called for it"
Doing what the situation calls for is one of those basic aspects of life which a shocking number of people either forget, because of today's Bread and Circuses, or they try to disavow it, for antiwhite reasons. I'm reading a good book about the border wars between white American frontiersmen and indians. The author William Hintzen explores why there was hostility against indians amongst some whites. He explains that it was for a very good reason: many of the indians frequently tortured their white captives severely, and the indians--men, women, and children--enjoyed doing this, until the captive died an amazingly horrible death. Enough whites escaped captivity to tell these awful stories back home. When the whites could be generous and humane to indians, many of them were, but with a state of warfare and constant raiding, whites on the frontier couldn't afford to be pacifist humanitarians. They were not anti-indian because of some intrinsic "racism" or greed of whites. It was because there was a fight for survival for their families. And race, of course, is an extended family.
There is a woke right. They're the people who took the cancel culture bullshit of the left and just changed the groups involved from blacks to Israelis. They are woke in favor of Israel and use all the exact same methods as the DEI crowd.
Apparently wanting to put monkeys back in the jungle is woke these days!
If you think nonwhites are human you have no clue, and probably are one of the monkeys yourself!
It really is just a trick: power to Jews and annihilation to whites. They continue it by simply avoiding speaking to anyone who'll ask challenging questions. They find the trick worthwhile as it captures dimwits and wastes the time and energy of better people.
>goes after people’s family members (struggle sessions)
I'll try to explain this one.
I've witnessed people, myself included, use the obstructions put up by DEI practices as absolute reasons why they cannot pursue employment or hobbies, for fear they will be prevented from doing so anyway, putting an end to their endeavours before they've started. This frustration exhibits itself as explaining to family, mainly parents or extended relatives, why they've not done anything when the matter is raised. The family members may not understand the reasons given, suggesting it was easy for them, detached from the reality what they were able to do was more accessible during their own youth, comparing the world they grew up in with the world now as the same somewhat. This is a self-perpetuating cycle, ergo 'struggle sessions', that never finds a resolution but is in search of other reasons why one cannot be found.
Well done, @millenial woes, capturing the essence of our side (Dissident Right) and the absurdity of the the "woke right" accusation. I've been looking for something like this to share with my friends and family.
The liberal sceptic uses a-priori reasoning when it comes to race. To them empirical evidence of achievement is unneccesary because they believe there are no fundamental difference between the races. Left-wing academic propaganda has caused so much damage.
James Lindsay is woke light - he accepts all of the premises of equality just not the speed at which woke race communism is moving.
It is important to recall that the term woke did not start as slander, rather the woke themselves referred to themselves as woke - for noticing the racial disparities which if it is assumed that all races are equal could only be attributed to racism. The woke believed being woke is good.
There already is a term that our movement is using. It is called based, as in based in reality. Why can't Lindsay refer to us using our own term as he does with woke? Perhaps because he knows being based is good.
The energy source for" woke" politics is the US civil rights legislation of the 1960s specifically designed to elevate blacks over whites. In the decades following other minorities have successfully claimed victimhood status too including white women who have been the biggest beneficiaries of affirmative action. So any attempt to forge a collective white identity is fatally compromised from the start.
Alex Krainer's latest. Very worth listening to.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J6J5TgPFFeY
pfff honestly using woke left, woke right reminds me of right, left
this is political stuff polarization
the left turned nuts and stopped becoming representative of the real left ideas
they created a nomenclature for it, "woke" - which is actually something restricted to the left, for now. Psychopathology
and so, as of now there are no grounds for nomenclaturing "woke right". We don't need so and should refrain. We should once we see 90% of rightists turning nuts
it's not for nothing that they targeted the left
that's because they were fertile grounds for parasiting
the right is less susceptible
Lindsay doesn't seem to have nuch criticism for the "collectivsm" of Israeli Jews though does he? 🧐
Good piece. Never be afraid to name them.
I'd like to see your opinion on Jews as a whole expounded upon. I've seen many Dissident Rightists (something which I do still call myself, to some extent) who very much do conform to the allegations of rabid and reasonless antisemitism. I'd like to see them pushed back against from a perspective that they would still find reasonable.
To clarify, I'm not Jewish.
'I'm not Jewish' need proof of that please.
Jesus Christ is Lord, and I am frustrated at your hysterical obsession.
People like Lindsay are writing essay after essay to try and make this stick, when in reality they are with Con Inc and asking right wingers who want actual change to just be Mitt Romney instead.
Whew! I read most of it! I’ve decided the best course is to pray for the Asteroid of Redemption to arrive quickly! Becoming primordial dust feels ennobling!
"It was anomalous for the US to inter Japanese people on the basis of their race during World War II, but it was done anyway because the situation called for it"
Doing what the situation calls for is one of those basic aspects of life which a shocking number of people either forget, because of today's Bread and Circuses, or they try to disavow it, for antiwhite reasons. I'm reading a good book about the border wars between white American frontiersmen and indians. The author William Hintzen explores why there was hostility against indians amongst some whites. He explains that it was for a very good reason: many of the indians frequently tortured their white captives severely, and the indians--men, women, and children--enjoyed doing this, until the captive died an amazingly horrible death. Enough whites escaped captivity to tell these awful stories back home. When the whites could be generous and humane to indians, many of them were, but with a state of warfare and constant raiding, whites on the frontier couldn't afford to be pacifist humanitarians. They were not anti-indian because of some intrinsic "racism" or greed of whites. It was because there was a fight for survival for their families. And race, of course, is an extended family.