I stopped voting for them when I realised they weren't nationalists. In the Bible God constantly talks about nation states and how they are important to people and to him and so nations and nationalism will never die and those that try to destroy nationalism will be broken to pieces by it and those that nationalism attacks will be ground to dust just like Sturgeon and her twisted WEF chums.
What did this "struggle" to understand the SNP consist of? If you read Paul Scott's Walter Scott and Scotland, he is prepared to endorse ethnic nationalism as part of a political position. The Determinations series of books (Polygon) goes in the same direction in places. So with magazines like Cencrastus or Radical Scotland. Similarly with the folk music scene. To say that these people didn't love Scottish culture or the Scottish people is not true at all. The subversion happened after that as part of the drive to take on Labour in the central belt.
One paradox was this: On the west coast of Ireland, you want to recruit a lifeguard. Should you employ the best swimmer, or the person who speaks the best Irish? What you ended up with was people like Sturgeon who embodied an antique Marxism and Scottish identity and supported the principle of sovereignty - alongside people like Salmond who used the idea of the community of the realm of Scotland that he borrowed from Geoffrey Barrow. This was ethnic, but allows for people coming and going - e.g. the Clearances, and small scale immigration. No-one had dreamed of the scale of modern immigration in the 1980s, or the effects of abortion on the size of the local population.
This is basically to say that there needs to be a radical right pro-independence party in Scotland. The question is: who will start it?
To be clear, I was not talking about the SNP of the past, but today - Sturgeon and now Yousaf, but also Salmond (whose Alba Party is extremely pro multiculturalism and who, in his time as SNP leader, introduced the concept of "New Scots").
Your analysis is accurate. The SNP politicians I know and work among have little to distinguish them in terms of policy from the other parties except their hatred of the “UK” which means the English. Thus as you say anyone can be Scottish if they share that hatred.
I suspect that it would be impossible to give an example of anything which a Scottish (or new Scottish) person might reasonably want to do, which England prevents him from doing. Am I wrong?
Children's plimsolls - white! The Swans in Holyrood Park - white! The clouds - white! The snow - white! The boards used in classrooms - white! Ice-creams - white! Toilet paper - white! Tablecloths - white! People's teeth - white! The milk in every bottle - white! The whites of people's eyes - white! How is this acceptable in modern Scotland?! (Great logical demolition of the ridiculous SNP btw! - All continuing power to your arm, Woes. )
The SNP would put tolerance at the top of any list national traits. But they would do the same for any EU member state. Scotland is the only country in Europe I would not be prepared to visit. I would expect animosity just for being English, but once they heard any of my opinions all hell would break loose - even outside of Glasgow.
I hope the Scottish people choose to leave Great Britain at the next opportunity. It's the only thing that might see off the SNP and make native Scots pay attention to who the poisonous ones in their own country are now that the hated English are just geographical neighbours.
If they do this, I would wish them all the best. The first couple of decades might be tough financially, but there is a lot more to life than money. Free of the SNP, an independent Scotland could become very interesting.
How fitting that the leader of the SNP is not even Scottish, save in the legal sense.
I don't recognise him as Scottish in any sense or the leader of Labour.
No one can be legally Scottish. That's the bone of contention.
I stopped voting for them when I realised they weren't nationalists. In the Bible God constantly talks about nation states and how they are important to people and to him and so nations and nationalism will never die and those that try to destroy nationalism will be broken to pieces by it and those that nationalism attacks will be ground to dust just like Sturgeon and her twisted WEF chums.
What did this "struggle" to understand the SNP consist of? If you read Paul Scott's Walter Scott and Scotland, he is prepared to endorse ethnic nationalism as part of a political position. The Determinations series of books (Polygon) goes in the same direction in places. So with magazines like Cencrastus or Radical Scotland. Similarly with the folk music scene. To say that these people didn't love Scottish culture or the Scottish people is not true at all. The subversion happened after that as part of the drive to take on Labour in the central belt.
One paradox was this: On the west coast of Ireland, you want to recruit a lifeguard. Should you employ the best swimmer, or the person who speaks the best Irish? What you ended up with was people like Sturgeon who embodied an antique Marxism and Scottish identity and supported the principle of sovereignty - alongside people like Salmond who used the idea of the community of the realm of Scotland that he borrowed from Geoffrey Barrow. This was ethnic, but allows for people coming and going - e.g. the Clearances, and small scale immigration. No-one had dreamed of the scale of modern immigration in the 1980s, or the effects of abortion on the size of the local population.
This is basically to say that there needs to be a radical right pro-independence party in Scotland. The question is: who will start it?
To be clear, I was not talking about the SNP of the past, but today - Sturgeon and now Yousaf, but also Salmond (whose Alba Party is extremely pro multiculturalism and who, in his time as SNP leader, introduced the concept of "New Scots").
Your analysis is accurate. The SNP politicians I know and work among have little to distinguish them in terms of policy from the other parties except their hatred of the “UK” which means the English. Thus as you say anyone can be Scottish if they share that hatred.
I suspect that it would be impossible to give an example of anything which a Scottish (or new Scottish) person might reasonably want to do, which England prevents him from doing. Am I wrong?
Children's plimsolls - white! The Swans in Holyrood Park - white! The clouds - white! The snow - white! The boards used in classrooms - white! Ice-creams - white! Toilet paper - white! Tablecloths - white! People's teeth - white! The milk in every bottle - white! The whites of people's eyes - white! How is this acceptable in modern Scotland?! (Great logical demolition of the ridiculous SNP btw! - All continuing power to your arm, Woes. )
LOL very good, and thank you.
The SNP would put tolerance at the top of any list national traits. But they would do the same for any EU member state. Scotland is the only country in Europe I would not be prepared to visit. I would expect animosity just for being English, but once they heard any of my opinions all hell would break loose - even outside of Glasgow.
I hope the Scottish people choose to leave Great Britain at the next opportunity. It's the only thing that might see off the SNP and make native Scots pay attention to who the poisonous ones in their own country are now that the hated English are just geographical neighbours.
If they do this, I would wish them all the best. The first couple of decades might be tough financially, but there is a lot more to life than money. Free of the SNP, an independent Scotland could become very interesting.