In late January 2024, signs emerged that the British state is concerned that, if the country goes to war with Russia, our armed forces are so depleted that ordinary people would need to be conscripted as soldiers.
They are brainwashing our parents, turning our siblings gay and pushing for the rape of our offspring. And the regime backs them. I would rather join Russia tbh.
If by globalist you mean "globohomo" i'd say no that is not the case at all. Russia has an homogenous population, no identity politics, no diversity movements, a strong religious culture, laws against the dissemination of homossexuality and reverence for their own culture. It's def not going woke, and when the West decided to isolate it economically it became even more of a bastion of "conservative" values.
I am referring to the Russian govt's enthusiasm regarding vaccinating for the phony pandemic and, I hear tell, anyway, that they are developing 15-minute cities. Is this true or not. I read that on basedunderground dot com.:
"One such city called Sber City was developed by Herman Gref. Apparently, what you do after you create “a whole universe of services for human life”, like cattle-tag systems for schoolchildren and surveillance cameras that can face-recognize muzzled wage slaves and even stray dogs, is you figure out how to enslave humanity even more."
Also, I don't think it is correct to say they have a homogeneous population; there's tons of Moslems there, just for starters. and every imaginable race and ethnic group, too. When their numbers get large enough, they will start pushing their weight around, just wait. Same as here.
The laws against dissemination of homosexuality are a good thing and let's see if that can continue or not. So, Russia is a mixed bag. Thanks for replying to me.
No it's not true. Plain and simple. It sounds like western propaganda. I mantain my arguments. Russia has a sane culture. Perhaps it's not as wealthy as the US and definitely not as wealthy as the scandinavian countries, but the grind can be tough for anyone if they dont make enough money to begin with.. As for lack of minorities i'm implying the majority of people are white, and the government is not systematically engeneeiring the replacement of its white population via policy like it's happening everywhere in the west.
You said, "No it's not true. Plain and simple. It sounds like western propaganda".
What portion of my comment fits into the category of "western propaganda"? The stuff about 15 minute cities? Enthusiasm for the kill shot? What. How do I find out the reality?
- Thanks.,
Horsea.
I am a getting-oldish woman who wants to know the truth of things instead of automatically believing whatever makes me feel good, a club most folks are paid-up members of.
British elites (those playing the eliteness game) imagine themselves LARPing as Churchill (and my American elites often do something similar). But today’s British elites don’t read their history deeply enough to see that the elites of the British (and French, and others) 1930s screwed up so bad that they had to turn the reigns over to a conservative curmudgeon just to save Britain from invasion. But there is no guarantee that the population will fight a war just to return elites to a position of continental power and influence. They may instead fight only to defend their homeland and kick out the elites who led them into disaster.
Well written, though I wonder what value parsing the mind of leftists will bring us in the DR. Critical analysis lends value to understanding ourselves, but this article seems to be a cathartic colour commentary rather than transformative. Again, well written.
Let’s turn our enemies the “dumb right” into soldiers and killing machines to fight Russia etc. and kill themselves. Well not all will be killed. Some will return home and perhaps start to kill the people - the left - who sent them to war. How dumb is that. “Be careful what you wish for as you may get it” as the old Chinese proverb says. Evil can only destroy so never go anywhere near it. Likewise your enemy is my enemy is not a good basis for a pact of mutuality.
The Russia-Ukraine war is basically Jews using one set of European whites to attrite another set of European whites, funded by the taxes of American whites. I'm not surprised they are willing to keep it going as long as possible
Let's address the elephant in the room. Gone is the left that was made up of men who advocated for labor laws that benefitted the working class. What now passes for the "left" is both feminist and feminine. It is dominated by women who have lived in a fantasy land since they were small children, and this may be why the modern "left" is so unreasonable, lacking in self-awareness and infantile. And I say this as a woman who thought of myself as a feminist when I was young, rejecting it when I realized that too many (most?) feminists were unreasonable, hypocritical and infantile midwits who were more interested in creating special protections for themselves than they were in equality.
This essay, while very articulate and effective at describing the nuances in the positions of the Left and Right concerning the war in Ukraine (or war in gemeral), is a perfect example of why I avoid Twitter like the plague. I understand that someone in your position cannot avoid it, and you have my sympathy. But it seems to me that as a platform it is wholly unsuited to that purpose for which we are attempting to use it. It's unfortunate but also appropriate that our moronic elites have taken it as the primary means by which to communicate and debate.
In the Current Year everything is loaded with some semiotic significance on one side or the other of (for lack of a better phrase) the culture war.
This means that, if the hawks attempted to shame non-conscripts by handing out white feathers to them, the white feathers would very quickly become RW-coded and assume the status of a badge of honour amongst dissidents.
I, for one, would be proud to wear a visible, physical symbol of my dissent from the Tony Blair Institute's worldview.
Spot on. Well put. And utterly tragic and maddening. Just went through a meltdown with one of these unable-to-connect-the-dots people; not only were his protestations weak and childish, his point was all Ad Hominem. Never mind the data. One must not think about this, or otherwise be a “bad person.”
Yes, he accused me of not reading “widely” when I pointed out that he was misrepresenting the conservative perspective on climate change. I threw out three titles he’d never heard of, ironically one written by a former member of the Obama administration. Didn’t I know that the science has been settled since he was in third grade (in the 70s). I said that I’d read quite a lot since then and moved my views to ‘not sure we’re doomed’ which upset him further. He was particularly vehement about fossil fuels, even though he recently moved into a huge house and drives everywhere (I live in a city and take public transportation.) Even more to the point, what one believes has little impact; it’s what one does.
-make entire society for women, gays, trans, and browns -need them to go to fucking war with Russia -your regime is now dead
The shared tweet reminds of a similar one from an American lefty who said "we should draft the unvaccinated!" at the the start of the Ukraine war.
Of course, this was said *right after* WuFlu vax refusers had been purged from the ranks. No self-awareness indeed.
They are brainwashing our parents, turning our siblings gay and pushing for the rape of our offspring. And the regime backs them. I would rather join Russia tbh.
Russia is going globalist. There is no place to run.
If by globalist you mean "globohomo" i'd say no that is not the case at all. Russia has an homogenous population, no identity politics, no diversity movements, a strong religious culture, laws against the dissemination of homossexuality and reverence for their own culture. It's def not going woke, and when the West decided to isolate it economically it became even more of a bastion of "conservative" values.
I am referring to the Russian govt's enthusiasm regarding vaccinating for the phony pandemic and, I hear tell, anyway, that they are developing 15-minute cities. Is this true or not. I read that on basedunderground dot com.:
"One such city called Sber City was developed by Herman Gref. Apparently, what you do after you create “a whole universe of services for human life”, like cattle-tag systems for schoolchildren and surveillance cameras that can face-recognize muzzled wage slaves and even stray dogs, is you figure out how to enslave humanity even more."
Also, I don't think it is correct to say they have a homogeneous population; there's tons of Moslems there, just for starters. and every imaginable race and ethnic group, too. When their numbers get large enough, they will start pushing their weight around, just wait. Same as here.
The laws against dissemination of homosexuality are a good thing and let's see if that can continue or not. So, Russia is a mixed bag. Thanks for replying to me.
No it's not true. Plain and simple. It sounds like western propaganda. I mantain my arguments. Russia has a sane culture. Perhaps it's not as wealthy as the US and definitely not as wealthy as the scandinavian countries, but the grind can be tough for anyone if they dont make enough money to begin with.. As for lack of minorities i'm implying the majority of people are white, and the government is not systematically engeneeiring the replacement of its white population via policy like it's happening everywhere in the west.
You said, "No it's not true. Plain and simple. It sounds like western propaganda".
What portion of my comment fits into the category of "western propaganda"? The stuff about 15 minute cities? Enthusiasm for the kill shot? What. How do I find out the reality?
- Thanks.,
Horsea.
I am a getting-oldish woman who wants to know the truth of things instead of automatically believing whatever makes me feel good, a club most folks are paid-up members of.
Yes the part about 15 minute cities. That is a WEF thing. Russia is not involved in any of that.
"Let the clowns die for Clown World" is my motto. I think England's best chance of survival is for Russia and China to liberate it from the globalists
British elites (those playing the eliteness game) imagine themselves LARPing as Churchill (and my American elites often do something similar). But today’s British elites don’t read their history deeply enough to see that the elites of the British (and French, and others) 1930s screwed up so bad that they had to turn the reigns over to a conservative curmudgeon just to save Britain from invasion. But there is no guarantee that the population will fight a war just to return elites to a position of continental power and influence. They may instead fight only to defend their homeland and kick out the elites who led them into disaster.
spot on. Very well and accurately said
Well written, though I wonder what value parsing the mind of leftists will bring us in the DR. Critical analysis lends value to understanding ourselves, but this article seems to be a cathartic colour commentary rather than transformative. Again, well written.
A neat and accurate summary. As one who did serve in HM Forces, I would not do so today. Not for globalist masters.
Let’s turn our enemies the “dumb right” into soldiers and killing machines to fight Russia etc. and kill themselves. Well not all will be killed. Some will return home and perhaps start to kill the people - the left - who sent them to war. How dumb is that. “Be careful what you wish for as you may get it” as the old Chinese proverb says. Evil can only destroy so never go anywhere near it. Likewise your enemy is my enemy is not a good basis for a pact of mutuality.
The Russia-Ukraine war is basically Jews using one set of European whites to attrite another set of European whites, funded by the taxes of American whites. I'm not surprised they are willing to keep it going as long as possible
German farmers have begun to instantiate their blockade of Berlin last night iirc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NDvuGEw4c0
Video has been removed by uploader. So, what was it all about?
This is a high quality piece, Colin. Cheers.
Ditto brer Collin! I have been somewhat disconnected from my compatriots (like your esteemed self) for too long.
Your logical heartfelt prose has wooed me back.
Let's address the elephant in the room. Gone is the left that was made up of men who advocated for labor laws that benefitted the working class. What now passes for the "left" is both feminist and feminine. It is dominated by women who have lived in a fantasy land since they were small children, and this may be why the modern "left" is so unreasonable, lacking in self-awareness and infantile. And I say this as a woman who thought of myself as a feminist when I was young, rejecting it when I realized that too many (most?) feminists were unreasonable, hypocritical and infantile midwits who were more interested in creating special protections for themselves than they were in equality.
".. they see themselves as the reasonable ones ..." - I don't think people in 'this thing' spend nearly enough time thinking about this!
This essay, while very articulate and effective at describing the nuances in the positions of the Left and Right concerning the war in Ukraine (or war in gemeral), is a perfect example of why I avoid Twitter like the plague. I understand that someone in your position cannot avoid it, and you have my sympathy. But it seems to me that as a platform it is wholly unsuited to that purpose for which we are attempting to use it. It's unfortunate but also appropriate that our moronic elites have taken it as the primary means by which to communicate and debate.
Let's see if they roll out White Feathers to shame what few military-age white men are left. Don't think it would work this time.
We'll just meme the feather into glory if they try.
In the Current Year everything is loaded with some semiotic significance on one side or the other of (for lack of a better phrase) the culture war.
This means that, if the hawks attempted to shame non-conscripts by handing out white feathers to them, the white feathers would very quickly become RW-coded and assume the status of a badge of honour amongst dissidents.
I, for one, would be proud to wear a visible, physical symbol of my dissent from the Tony Blair Institute's worldview.
Indeed, you can imagine the memes - white feather, white fathers, white fatherland, white stag.
Spot on. Well put. And utterly tragic and maddening. Just went through a meltdown with one of these unable-to-connect-the-dots people; not only were his protestations weak and childish, his point was all Ad Hominem. Never mind the data. One must not think about this, or otherwise be a “bad person.”
That person will also no doubt be happy to lecture you about the importance of open mindedness and critical thinking.
Yes, he accused me of not reading “widely” when I pointed out that he was misrepresenting the conservative perspective on climate change. I threw out three titles he’d never heard of, ironically one written by a former member of the Obama administration. Didn’t I know that the science has been settled since he was in third grade (in the 70s). I said that I’d read quite a lot since then and moved my views to ‘not sure we’re doomed’ which upset him further. He was particularly vehement about fossil fuels, even though he recently moved into a huge house and drives everywhere (I live in a city and take public transportation.) Even more to the point, what one believes has little impact; it’s what one does.
And further, what one does tells us what they actually believe or value regardless of the contrary things they recite for social points.